0
$\begingroup$

$(X_n)$ is a sequence of random variables having the following distribution:

$$P(X_n=1)=1- \frac{1}{n},\; P(X_n=0)=\frac{1}{n}$$ (we don't assume that those variables are independent). $X$ is some random variable. We consider variables $Y_n=XX_n$. Does $(Y_n)$ converge almost surely? Does it converge in probability?

I think that $Y_{n} \to X$ a.s., because $X_n \to 1$ a.s.

Using Chebyshev's inequality we have for $\epsilon > 0$:

$$P(\left|X_{n}-1 \right| \ge \epsilon ) \le \frac{\text{E}(X_n-1)}{\epsilon} \le -\frac{1}{\epsilon n}$$

Seeing that $$-\sum\frac{1}{\epsilon n}=-\infty,$$ we conclude that $$\sum P(\left|X_{n}-1 \right| \ge \epsilon ) <+\infty.$$ Hence $X_n \to 1$ a.s.

Convergence in probability stems from almost sure convergence.

Is everything there okay?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ math.stackexchange.com/q/1325295 Same class? $\endgroup$ – Did Jun 14 '15 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ Who knows ;) Maybe it's just the same problem... $\endgroup$ – mrnobody Jun 14 '15 at 20:42
  • $\begingroup$ Does your teacher know you are outsourcing your homework? $\endgroup$ – Did Jun 14 '15 at 22:55
  • $\begingroup$ It's not a homework... I've found this problem on the list of exemplary exercies before the exam... $\endgroup$ – mrnobody Jun 15 '15 at 0:04
2
$\begingroup$

No, this isn't correct.

Chebyshev's inequality says that for any non-negative random variable $Z$ and any $\epsilon > 0$, we have $$P(Z \ge \epsilon) \le \frac{E[Z]}{\epsilon}.$$

You are applying this with $Z = |X_n - 1|$, so you get $$P(|X_n - 1| \ge \epsilon) \le \frac{E[|X_n - 1|]}{\epsilon}.$$ Note the absolute value bars on the right side, which you apparently dropped. Now $E[|X_n - 1|] = 1/n$, not $-1/n$, and you get $P(|X_n - 1| \ge \epsilon) \le \frac{1}{n \epsilon}$. This is true but a bit silly, since you can get a better bound without Chebyshev: for $\epsilon \le 1$ you have $P(|X_n - 1| \ge \epsilon) = P(X_n = 0) = 1/n$, and for $\epsilon > 1$ you have $P(|X_n - 1| \ge \epsilon) = 0$. But this also doesn't help you apply Borel-Cantelli.

As an immediate sign that something was wrong, note that your argument "showed" that the probability of an event, which by definition is between 0 and 1, was less than or equal to a negative number. Uh oh.

In fact, you cannot prove from the given information that $X_n \to 1$ a.s., because that can be false. Suppose that the random variables $X_n$ were independent (the statement of the problem doesn't assume this, but also doesn't rule it out). Then you can use the second Borel-Cantelli lemma to show that $P(X_n = 0 \text{ i.o.}) = 1$ and also $P(X_n = 1 \text{ i.o.}) = 1$. Hence the sequence diverges almost surely.

It is true that $X_n \to 1$ in probability. You can use Chebyshev for this (if you use it correctly) but the "better bound" I mention above seems easier.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.