3
$\begingroup$

I have the following metric $$ ds^2 = dt^2-dx^2 $$ and I wanted to prove to myself that the shortest path for this metric is straight. I used the following relation $x=f(t)$ and $$ S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \sqrt{1-[f'(t)]^2} \ dt $$ If I minimize $S$, I obtain the condition $f''(t)=0$, which implies $x=ct+x_0$, being a straight line in Euclidean space. I have difficulty understanding what it means to minimize hyperbolic path distances, because the square of the distance between two points can be zero or negative. I believe my answer is not correct.

Is the shortest path in flat hyperbolic space straight relative to Euclidean space?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's important to note that $\mathbb R^2$ with the metric $ds^2$ that you wrote down is not "hyperbolic space" -- instead, it's $2$-dimensional Minkowski space. Hyperbolic space is a Riemannian manifold with constant negative sectional curvature. $\endgroup$ – Jack Lee Jun 18 '15 at 18:21
3
$\begingroup$

Your answer is almost correct. You have that straight lines are the critical points of the arc-lenght functional. These lines minimize arc-lenght if they are timelike or lightlike, but they maximize arc-lenght if spacelike. This is sort of expected, since the connection of this Lorentz plane is the same as the connection from $\Bbb R^2$ and the Christoffel symbols all vanish.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Going back to basics

That a line is the shortest path just follows from the triangle inequality.

The triangle inequality is a theorem of neutral geometry (so valid in both euclidean and hyperbolic geometry )

what else is there to say?

maybe a link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_inequality

in Euclid's elements it is proposition 20 of book 1

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Note that the OP uses "hyperbolic space" to refer to the real plane equipped with the flat Lorentz (i.e., Minkowski) metric, not the usual (Riemannian, non-flat) hyperbolic plane. :) $\endgroup$ – Andrew D. Hwang Jun 13 '15 at 15:58
  • $\begingroup$ The triangle inequality is in the other direction for timelike vectors.. $\endgroup$ – Ivo Terek Jun 18 '15 at 1:38
  • $\begingroup$ @AndrewD.Hwang moved this point to a seperate question math.stackexchange.com/questions/1329906/… $\endgroup$ – Willemien Jun 18 '15 at 8:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Willemien I gave an answer to your follow-up question there, I hope it helps. $\endgroup$ – Ivo Terek Jun 18 '15 at 10:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.