Let $\Gamma_0(4)$ be a congruence subgroup of $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ defined as

$$\Gamma_0(4)=\{M=\begin{pmatrix} a &b\\ c& d \end{pmatrix}\in SL(2,\mathbb{Z})\mid c=0\bmod 4\}.$$ Dedekind eta-function is defined as $$\eta(z)=q^{1/24}\prod_{n\geq1}(1-q^n).$$

How to prove that the ideal of cusp forms for $\Gamma_0(4)$ is principal and generated by



The form $f(z)$ generates the $\Gamma_0(4)$ cuspforms (as an ideal over the graded ring of all modular forms for $\Gamma_0(4)$) for much the same reason that $\Delta(z) = \eta(z)^{24}$ generates the cuspforms for the full modular group $\Gamma(1) = {\rm SL}_2({\bf Z})$: this $f$ is a cuspform with no zeros in the finite plane, and it vanishes at each cusp only to the multiplicity needed to make it a cuspform. Hence if $\varphi$ is any other cuspform, say of weight $w$, then $\varphi_1 := \varphi/f$ is a modular form of weight $w-6$, and we have written $\varphi$ as $f \varphi_1$ for some modular form $\varphi_1$ as desired.

The fact that there are no zeros in the finite plane is clear from the product formula for $\eta(z)$. The vanishing order at the cusps is easier to see if we change variables to $w := 2z$, because then $f(z) = \eta(w)^{12}$ is a cuspform for the action of $\Gamma(2)$ on $w$, and the three cusps of $\Gamma(2)$ all have the same width (namely $2$) because they're transitively permuted by $\Gamma(1)$, so $\eta(w)^{12}$ vanishes to order $1$ at each cusp.

Similar examples for other groups are $\eta(3z)^8$ for $\Gamma_0(9)$ (equivalently $\eta(z)^8$ for $\Gamma(3)$), and $(\eta(z)\eta(pz))^w$ for $\Gamma_0(p)$ with $p=2,3,5,11$ (i.e. the primes with $p+1\mid12$) and $(p+1)w=24$. The last of these also works for $p=7$ and $p=23$ if we allow modular forms with quadratic character.

  • $\begingroup$ Noam, thank you! There is a little misprint in your answer: it seems that it should be $\phi_1=\phi/f$. $\endgroup$ – vitaliy Jun 17 '15 at 21:39
  • $\begingroup$ You're welcome, and thank you for the correction; I'll fix it next (though retaining $\varphi$ in place of $\phi$ [\varphi vs. \phi in TeX). $\endgroup$ – Noam D. Elkies Jun 17 '15 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ Dear Noam, can you explain please why the coefficients of the expansion of $f(z)$ are multiplicative? I know that this fact is related to the notion of Hecke operators for the group $\Gamma_0(4)$ but I haven't found the suitable reference. Actually as I understand I need to prove that $f(z)$ (which is normalized) is the eigenform of Hecke operators for $\Gamma_0(4)$. Thank you. $\endgroup$ – vitaliy Jun 18 '15 at 20:54
  • $\begingroup$ In Zagier's "1-2-3" the case of congruence subgroups of $SL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ is not explained. $\endgroup$ – vitaliy Jun 18 '15 at 20:56
  • $\begingroup$ The Hecke operators act on the space of cusp forms, and since that space is one-dimensional $f$ is automatically an eigenform. Sorry I don't have a reference to hand (maybe somebody else here can suggest one) but you might be able to figure out for yourself how to generalize the definition of $T_m$ that you learned from Zagier to congruence groups $\Gamma_0(n)$ with $\gcd(m,n)=1$ (and how this yields multiplicativity at least for coefficients of $q^k$ with $\gcd(k,n)=1$). $\endgroup$ – Noam D. Elkies Jun 18 '15 at 22:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.