1
$\begingroup$

I want to prove that a field $F$ of characteristic $p$, is perfect if and only if every element in $F$ has a $p$th root in $F$.

We say that $F$ is perfect if every polynomial $f(x)\in F[x]$ is separable, where we say that $f(x)$ is separable if its irreducible factors have no repeated roots.

Every element of $F$ has a $p$th root in $F$ means that if we fix $\alpha\in F$, then the polynomial $x^p-\alpha$ has a root. But how can I factor $x^p-\alpha$?

Conversely, if $f(x)\in F[x]$ and every element has a $p$th root, how can I manage $f(x)$ in order to show it is separable?

Could anyone give me a hint?

Thank you.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If $\beta\in F$ is a root of the polynomial $x^p-\alpha$, then we have the factorization $x^p-\alpha=(x-\beta)^p$. $\endgroup$ – Zev Chonoles Jun 6 '15 at 7:00
  • $\begingroup$ How it is related to an arbitrary $f(x)\in F[x]$? $\endgroup$ – Sandor Jun 6 '15 at 7:29
  • $\begingroup$ @timbuc the former, he included that in the question already $\endgroup$ – Christopher Jun 6 '15 at 10:24
  • $\begingroup$ @user73985 Right. Thank you. $\endgroup$ – Timbuc Jun 6 '15 at 10:32
2
$\begingroup$

Fill in the (usually small) details in the following:

It is probably easier to show the double negation: $\;\Bbb F\;$ is inseparable iff $\;\Bbb F^p\setminus\Bbb F\neq\emptyset\;$

== So take $\;a\in\Bbb F^p\setminus\Bbb F\;$ . If $\;\beta\;$ in some non-trivial extension of $\;\Bbb F\;$ is s.t. $\;\beta^p=a\;$ , then

$$f_a(x):=x^p-a=x^p-\beta^p=(x-\beta)^p\in\Bbb F[x]$$

If $\;f_a(x)\;$ isn't irreducible over $\;\Bbb F\;$, then the right hand above shows that it must have a non-trivial factor in $\;\Bbb F[x]\;$ of the form $\;(x-\beta)^n\;,\;\;1\le n\le p-1\;$ . This polynomial's coefficient of $\;x^{n-1}\;$ is $\;-n\beta\;$ and it belongs to $\;\Bbb F\;$ . Since $\; n(\neq0)\;$ belongs to the prime field $\;\Bbb F_p\le\Bbb F\;$ , we get that it is obviously invertible there and thus

$$-n\beta\in\Bbb F\implies \beta\in\Bbb F\;\implies\;a=\beta^p\in\Bbb F$$

which is a contradiction. Thus, $\;f_a(x)\;$ is irreducible.

== Suppose now there exists an inseparable irreducible $\;g(x)\in\Bbb F[x]\;$ . Then it must be that $\;g'(x)\equiv0\;$ , so that $\;g\;$ is a polynomial in $\;x^p\;$ :

$$g(x)=\sum_{k=0}^m a_kx^{pk}$$

If we had that $\;\Bbb F^p=\Bbb F\;$ , then for all $\;0\le k\le m\;$ there exist $\;b_k\;$ s.t. $\;a_k=b_k^p\;$ , but then

$$g(x)=\sum_{k=0}^m a_kx^{pk}=\sum_{k=0}^mb_k^p\left(x^k\right)^p=\left(\sum_{k=0}^m b_kx^k\right)^p$$

which contradicts the fact that $\;g\;$ is irreducible.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I loved this answer. Thank you!! $\endgroup$ – Sandor Jun 6 '15 at 18:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.