4
$\begingroup$

If $x$ is positive rational number less than $\frac{1}{2}$, can the following logarithmic expression be equivalent to real algebraic number, say $g$?

$$\frac{\log(1-x)}{\log x} = g$$

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Hint: $\frac{\log(1-x)}{\log x}=g\Rightarrow \log(1-x)=\log x^g\Rightarrow 1-x=x^g$ $\endgroup$ – Scippy Jun 4 '15 at 12:58
13
$\begingroup$

Your identity gives: $$ 1-x = x^g \tag{1}$$ where $x\in\mathbb{Q}$ trivially gives that the LHS is a rational number. If $g$ is not a rational number, the Gelfond-Schneider theorem gives that the RHS is a trascendental number, contradiction.

So $g$ has to be a rational number. But in order that $1-x$ and $x^g$ are rational numbers with the same denominator, $g$ has to be one. So $x=\frac{1}{2}$ and $g=1$ is the only solution.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Actually the question was excluding (x=1/2 or x= 0), therefore, no solution for the alleged question or equation unless (g) is transcendental number? $\endgroup$ – bassam karzeddin Jun 4 '15 at 13:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @bassamkarzeddin: yes, exactly. $\endgroup$ – Jack D'Aurizio Jun 4 '15 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ Which proves FLT in short!! $\endgroup$ – bassam karzeddin Jun 4 '15 at 13:43
  • 12
    $\begingroup$ I don't believe this proves FLT... $\endgroup$ – Zach Effman Jun 4 '15 at 22:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.