3
$\begingroup$

Let $A, B$ be commutative rings such that $A\subseteq B$ and $B$ is integral over $A$. I want to prove that if $\mathfrak{q}_{1},\mathfrak{q}_{2}$ are prime ideals of $B$ such that $\mathfrak{q}_{1}\subsetneq\mathfrak{q}_{2}$, then $A\cap\mathfrak{q}_{1}\subsetneq A\cap\mathfrak{q}_{2}$.

I get most of my examples of commutative algebra from the ring of integers of number fields, but now I am blocked, because the dimension of those rings is $1$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Btw, this property of integral extensions is called incomparable. $\endgroup$ – user26857 Jun 3 '15 at 12:24
2
$\begingroup$

Have you tried to suppose $A\cap q_1=A\cap q_2$? Let's do it and set $p=A\cap q_1=A\cap q_2$. Since $A/p\subset B/q_1$ is integral we may reduce the question to the following:

$A\subset B$ is an integral extension of integral domains and $q$ is a prime ideal in $B$ with $q\cap A=0$. Show that $q=0$.

Let $b\in q$, and suppose $b\ne 0$. Then $b$ is integral over $A$, so $b^n+a_{n-1}b^{n-1}+\cdots+ a_1b+a_0=0$ with $a_i\in A$. We can assume $a_0\ne 0$ (why?). It follows $a_0\in q\cap A$, a contradiction.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.