I have the following linear map: $L: \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2$.

Now, suppose $L\left( \left[\begin{matrix} 1 \\ 1\end{matrix} \right]\right) = \left[\begin{matrix} 1 \\ 4\end{matrix} \right]$ and $L\left( \left[\begin{matrix} 2 \\ -1\end{matrix} \right]\right) = \left[\begin{matrix} -2 \\ 3\end{matrix} \right]$.

My question is, how can we find $L\left( \left[\begin{matrix} 3 \\ -1\end{matrix} \right]\right)$ from the information given above, and why?

I understood that a linear map associates (or transforms) a vector with another one, it is like a function, for example $f(x) := x^2$, for every input we have some output, and this mapping is related to the function itself.

Now, I suppose that I need to find what is this map anyway.

I have actually a solution here, but I don't understand it:

Assume $\left[\begin{matrix} 3 \\ -1\end{matrix} \right] = x \left[\begin{matrix} 1 \\ 1\end{matrix} \right] + y \left[\begin{matrix} 2 \\ -1\end{matrix} \right]$, then $x = \frac{1}{3}$, $y = \frac{4}{3}$. Therefore $L\left( \left[\begin{matrix} 3 \\ -1\end{matrix} \right]\right)$ = $L\left( x\left[\begin{matrix} 1 \\ 1\end{matrix} \right] + y\left[\begin{matrix} 2 \\ -1\end{matrix} \right]\right)$ = $\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{matrix} 1 \\ 4\end{matrix} \right] + \frac{4}{3}\left[\begin{matrix} -2 \\ 3\end{matrix} \right]$ = $\left[\begin{matrix} \frac{-7}{3} \\ \frac{16}{3}\end{matrix} \right]$.

What I don't understand is:

  • why should the vector $\left[\begin{matrix} 3 \\ -1\end{matrix} \right]$ be represented as a linear combination of the other 2?

  • Why it uses this fact for applying then the linear map on $\left[\begin{matrix} 3 \\ -1\end{matrix} \right]$?

I cannot understand the connection between the whole parts of the problem sincerely.

How should one proceed in general in this kind of situations?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have found this lecture by professor Strang that really explains what is behind this solutions. Check this out! $\endgroup$ – nbro Jun 2 '15 at 20:24

You are given a linear transformation $L:\mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^2$. To define a linear transformation, it is sufficient (and necessairy) to define it on a base of your domain. In this case, the base is $B=\{(1,1);(2,-1)\}$. It is easy to see that $B$ is a base for $\mathbb{R}^2$ since the vectors are linearly independent.

Now, since $B$ is a base for $\mathbb{R}^2$, it means that any vector $v \in \mathbb{R}^2$ can be written as a linear combination of elements of the base $B$. In particular, your vector $(3,-1)=1/3(1,1) + 4/3(2,-1)$.

Now we know that $L$ is a linear transformation, which means that given $v,w \in \mathbb{R}^2$ and $\lambda, \mu \in \mathbb{R}$ we have that $L(\mu v+\lambda w)=\mu L(v) + \lambda L(w)$

Therefore, to calculate $L(3,-1)$, we first express our vector $(3,-1)$ as a linear combination of $(1,1)$ and $(2,-1)$ as $(3,-1)=1/3(1,1) + 4/3(2,-1)$ and apply our knowledge on linear transformations!

\begin{align} L(3,-1)&=L(1/3(1,1) + 4/3(2,-1)) \\ &=L(1/3(1,1))+L(4/3(2,-1)) \\ &=1/3L(1,1)+4/3L(2,-1) \\ &=1/3(1,4) + 4/3(-2,3) = (-7/3,16/3) \end{align}

And we are done!


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.