2
$\begingroup$

Show that there is no proper holomorphic map from an annulus $A_r=\{z \in \mathbb C:1 <|z| < r \}$ to the punctured unit disc.

Def:A map $f: X \to Y$ is called proper if $f^{-1}(K)$ is compact for every compact set $K$ in Y.

Author gives a hint that there is a covering map from unit disc to punctured unit disc whose fibers are infinite.But I am unable to see how to use this hint. please give some hints/ideas to prove this.

The non existence of such a map in the reverse direction can be found here:Non Existence of a proper holomorphic map from the punctured unit disc to an Annulus.

Can someone please give a reference for reading about construction of proper maps between different domains in $ \mathbb C$ ?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Here's one way to prove this, although it doesn't use the hint.

Let $\mathbb{D}^*$ denote the punctured unit disk, and suppose that $f\colon A_r \to \mathbb{D}^*$ is a proper holomorphic map. I claim that the limits $$ \lim_{|z|\to 1^+} |f(z)| \qquad\text{and}\qquad \lim_{|z|\to r^-} |f(z)| $$ both exist, and are each either $0$ or $1$.

To see this, let $\epsilon > 0$, and consider the map $g\colon A_r \to (0,1)$ defined by $g(z) = |f(z)|$. Note that $g$ is proper, being the composition of two proper maps. Then $K = g^{-1}\bigl([\epsilon,1-\epsilon]\bigr)$ is a compact subset of $A_r$. By the tube lemma, there exists a $\delta >0 $ so that $A_{1+\delta} \subset A_r -K$, where $A_{1+\delta}$ denotes the annulus $1<|z|<1+\delta$, so $g$ maps $A_{1+\delta}$ to the complement of $[\epsilon,1-\epsilon]$. Since $A_{1+\delta}$ is connected, it follows that either $g(A_{1+\delta}) \subset (0,\epsilon)$ or $g(A_{1+\delta})\subset (1-\epsilon,1)$. Since $\epsilon$ was arbitrary, we conclude that the first limit exists, and is equal to either $0$ or $1$. A similar argument holds for the second limit.

We now obtain a contradiction, using two cases:

  1. Suppose one of the limits above is equal to $0$, say the first limit. In this case we get a contradiction from the Schwarz reflection principle. Specifically, let $R$ be the region $0<\mathrm{Im}(z)<\log(r)$, and let $h\colon R\to\mathbb{C}$ be the function $h(z) = f\bigl(e^{-iz}\bigr)$. Then $R$ is holomorphic and tends to zero as $\mathrm{Im}(z) \to 0$. By the Schwarz reflection principle, $h$ extends to a holomorphic function on the region $-\log(r) < \mathrm{Im}(z) < \log(r)$. But $h$ is $0$ on the real axis, so $h$ must be the zero function, a contradiction.

  2. Suppose that both of the limits above are equal to $1$. In this case we get a contradiction from the minimum modulus principle. Let $\epsilon > 0$. Since $|f(z)| \to 1$ as $z \to \partial A_r$, there exists a $\delta > 0$ so that $|f(z)| > 1-\epsilon$ when $z$ is within $\delta$ of $\partial A_r$. Using the minimum modulus principle for $f$ on the annulus $1+\delta \leq |z| \leq r-\delta$, we conclude that $|f(z)| > 1-\epsilon$ for all $z\in A_r$, a contradiction since $\epsilon$ was arbitrary.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry..can you please explain how are you using tube lemma? $\endgroup$ – Dontknowanything Jun 4 '15 at 9:56
  • $\begingroup$ @Learner If $U$ is an open set in $[0,1]\times S^1$ containing $\{0\}\times S^1$, then there exists a "tube" $[0,\epsilon) \times S^1$ contained in $U$. $\endgroup$ – Jim Belk Jun 4 '15 at 14:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.