3
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to understand the deep relations between the tangent line to the graph of a function $f$ at a given point $P$, and the derivative of $f$ at the same point.

Indeed, in many books the derivative is often defined as the slope of the "tangent", with only an intuitive definition of what a tangent line is. Then, once the concept of derivative is well assimilated, books define more precisely the tangent as... the line passing through $P = (a, f(a))$ with slope $f'(a)$ ! This seems a bit circular.

So some authors use an other approach, starting by giving a geometric definition of a tangent, and then showing the connection with derivatives. That's what one can read in the paper "What a tangent line is when it isn't a limit", by Irl Bivens. But I am missing something in the proof of Theorem 1, when the author writes:

it suffices to show that $|f(x)-L(x)|\leq (1/2)|L(x)-K(x)|$

where $f$ is a differentiable function, $L$ is the line of equation $L(x) = f'(a)(x-a)+f(a)$ and $K$ an other line, of equation $K(x)=p(x-a)+f(a)$ with $p \neq f'(a)$. So, basically, the goal is to show that $L$ is a better approximation of $f$ than any $K$.

But where does the right-hand side come from ? It looks like, locally, $f(x) = 1/2 (L(x)+K(x))$, but why?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps it would be helpful if you included a little more context here, at the very least describe what the symbols $f, L, K$ are are. $\endgroup$ – Travis May 30 '15 at 14:36
1
$\begingroup$

Given that $$ |L(x)-K(x)|=|L(x)-f(x)+f(x)-K(x)|\leq|f(x)-L(x)|+|f(x)-K(x)|\tag1, $$ if $$ |L(x)-K(x)|\geq2|f(x)-L(x)|\tag2 $$ then $$ 2|f(x)-L(x)|\leq|f(x)-L(x)|+|f(x)-K(x)|, $$ from which you obtain easily that $$ |f(x)-L(x)|\leq|f(x)-K(x)|\tag3. $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, @enzotib; but I'm sorry, I don't understand where the first inequality comes from, neither the connection with my question? $\endgroup$ – Greg82 May 30 '15 at 16:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Greg82: $(1)$ is a simple application of the triangular inequality, $(2)$ is your inequality, $(3)$ is the inequality defining the tangent line, I show that $(1)+(2)\implies(3)$. $\endgroup$ – enzotib May 30 '15 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ @ enzotib: perfectly clear now, thanks a lot! $\endgroup$ – Greg82 May 30 '15 at 16:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.