0
$\begingroup$

I have a line $L\subset\mathbb{C}^n$ which is parametrized by $x_1=a_1t, x_2=a_2t,\dots, x_n=a_nt$, a function $f(x_1,\dots,x_n)$, and I want to look at the restriction of $f$ onto $L$. This is just $f(a_1t,\dots,a_nt)$, but the part I'm having trouble with is that I want an expression for $\partial f/\partial x_i$ restricted to L, i.e. as a function of $t$.

Is there some simple way to do this with the chain rule? Of course simply taking $\partial f/\partial x_i = dt/dx_i \ df/dt$ doesn't work. Is there any simple expression for the derivative that does not directly involve $\partial f/\partial x_i$?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

When you sit in a space ship with a thermometer in your hand you can measure the felt temperature $t\to u(t):=f\bigl({\bf x}(t)\bigr)$, and you can calculate its time derivative ${du\over dt}$. When you know your exact flight-path $t\mapsto{\bf x}(t)$ you will be able to say something about the directional derivative of the underlying temperature function $(x_1,x_2,x_3)\mapsto f(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ in your momentaneous flight direction $\dot{\bf x}(t)$, but there is no way to get information about the temperature change in other directions, in particular in the direction of the coordinate axes. Therefore from ${du\over dt}$ alone you will not get information about the partial derivatives ${\partial f\over\partial x_i}$. A more down to earth argument would be the following: From one number ${du\over dt}$ you cannot distill three numbers ${\partial f\over\partial x_i}$ if no extra dependencies are present in the given situation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.