No, it is impossible.
Given any list of $n$ numbers $X_k$ without any constraint of its order. Let
$$\begin{cases}
\overline{X} &= \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^n X_k\\
\overline{X^2} &= \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^n X_k^2
\end{cases}
\quad\text{ and }\quad
\begin{cases}
P &= \max\{ X_k : 1 \le k \le n \}\\
Q &= \min\{ X_k : 1 \le k \le n \}
\end{cases}
$$
The (biased) sample variances and unbiased sample variance for the numbers $X_k$ are given by the formulas
$$\begin{cases}
\sigma_X^2 &= \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{k=1}^n (X_k - \overline{X})^2 = \overline{X^2} - \overline{X}^2\\
s_X^2 &= \frac{1}{n-1}\sum\limits_{k=1}^n (X_k - \overline{X})^2 = \frac{n}{n-1}\sigma_X^2
\end{cases}$$
Since $(P - X_k)(X_k - Q) \ge 0$ for all $1 \le k \le n$, we have
$$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^n (P - X_k)(X_k - Q) \ge 0
\iff -PQ + (P+Q)\overline{X} - \overline{X^2} \ge 0\\
\implies \sigma_X^2 = (\overline{X^2} - \overline{X}^2) \le (P - \overline{X})(\overline{X} - Q)$$
This inequality is a special case of the Bhatia-Davis inequality.
Since $P \ge \overline{X} \ge Q$, this leads to
the Popoviciu's inequality on variances:
$$\sigma_X^2 \le \frac14 (P-Q)^2
\quad\iff\quad
s_X^2 = \frac{n}{n-1}\sigma_X^2 \le \frac{n}{4(n-1)}(P-Q)^2$$
Apply this to our problem where $P - Q = 10$, it is clear there is no way for the (biased) sample variances $\sigma_X^2$ to be equal to $40$. For the unbiased sample variances, if we want $s_X^2 = 40$, we need
$$40 \le \frac{n}{4(n-1)}10^2 = 25\frac{n}{n-1}\quad\implies\quad n \le \frac{8}{3}$$
Since $n$ is an integer $\ge 2$, $n$ can only be $2$. However when $n = 2$,
$$\begin{cases}
\overline{X} &= \frac{P+Q}{2}\\
\overline{X^2} &= \frac{P^2+Q^2}{2}
\end{cases}
\quad\implies\quad
\begin{align}
s_X^2 &= \frac{2}{2-1}\left(\overline{X^2} - \overline{X}^2\right)
= P^2 + Q^2 - \frac{(P+Q)^2}{2}\\
&= \frac12(P-Q)^2 = 50
\end{align}
$$
This doesn't match the given number $40$ again. As a result, there is no data-set which can produces the desired mean, range and sample variances (for both biased and unbiased one).