(Note: This question has been cross-posted from MO.)
Let $\sigma$ be the classical sum-of-divisors function.
A number is said to be perfect if $\sigma(N)=2N$.
If $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with Euler prime $q$ (i.e., $q \equiv k \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ and $\gcd(q,n)=1$), are the following statements known to hold in general?
(a) $\gcd(n^2, \sigma(n^2))$ is large.
(b) The deficiency $D(n^2) = 2n^2 - \sigma(n^2)$ is large.
(c) The index $i(q^k) = \sigma(N/q^k)/q^k$ is large.
Using the trivial relationships:
$$\gcd(n^2, \sigma(n^2)) = \frac{D(n^2)}{\sigma(q^{k-1})} = i(q^k) = \frac{2n^2}{\sigma(q^k)}$$
then if the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $k = 1$ is true, it is possible to show that a lower bound for the quantities (a), (b) and (c) is given by $n/\sqrt{3}$. (Here, I have used Acquaah and Konyagin's estimate $q < n\sqrt{3}$. The inequality $q^k < n^2$ then gives the desired large numerical bound if we use known lower bounds for the odd perfect number $N = q^k n^2$, latest of which are by Ochem and Rao.)
What happens when $k > 1$? I do know that $$\frac{\sigma(N/q^k)}{q^k} = \sigma(n^2)/q^k \geq 315$$ by using a result of Broughan, Delbourgo, and Zhou.
Is it possible to do better than this, apart from attempting a proof of (obviously) $q^k < n$?