1
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have the following sequence:

$$\{0,i,2i,3i,4i,5i\}$$

Can we call this sequence an arithmetic progression with first term $0$ and common difference of $i$ ?

Clarification: Here, $i$ is referring to the imaginary unit, i.e., $i=\sqrt{-1}$

In general, I want to know if the common difference of an AP can be any complex value and not just real value.

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't see why not. In fact, those elementary formulae (the sum of $n$ terms, etc) can be applied. $\endgroup$ – ajotatxe May 26 '15 at 17:59
  • $\begingroup$ @ajotatxe, I thought so too but lately I saw a few websites where they are suggesting that the common difference is restricted to reals, which is the reason for me asking this question. $\endgroup$ – tom_cruise May 26 '15 at 18:01
  • $\begingroup$ @tom_cruise If you have a specific result in mind about arithmetic progressions, that might impose further restrictions. Else you can go as far as to have a group or even just a monoid. $\endgroup$ – AlexR May 26 '15 at 18:04
  • $\begingroup$ An arithmetic sequence can be thought of as a set of (equally-spaced) points along a line in $ \ \mathbf{R}^2 \ \ $; the common difference between terms is related to the "slope" of the line. One can perfectly well define a line in the complex plane in this fashion, except that the integer parameter corresponding to each point is not plotted on such a "graph". $\endgroup$ – colormegone May 26 '15 at 18:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AlexR, in my case, the number of terms is odd, so can't we create w.l.o.g the following AP: $\{a+j\delta\}_{j=-k}^{j=k}$ where $n=2k+1$ is the number of terms and $a,\delta$ are constant values with $\delta$ being the common difference. My question is: Is there necessarily any restriction on the domain of $\delta$ ? $\endgroup$ – tom_cruise May 26 '15 at 18:14
0
$\begingroup$

You can define an arithmetic progression in any monoid $(M,+)$. It is then defined by a starting element $a\in M$ and an increment $b\in M$ and the recursion $$a_0 = a\\ a_{n+1} = a_n + b$$

There is no reason to restrict to reals $(\mathbb R,+)$ or complex numbers $(\mathbb C, +)$. For some results about arithmetic progressions, you might want $M$ to be an (abelian) group or even a field (both is true for the two settings mentioned here).


For a complex finite arithmetic progression $\{z,z+w, \ldots, z+nw\}$ to have a real sum, you must actually force $$\Im \sum_{k=0}^n (z+kw) = \Im \left((n+1)z + \frac{n(n+1)}2w\right) = (n+1)\Im z + \frac{n(n+1)}2 \Im w \stackrel!=0$$ In other words you can freely pick the real parts of $z$ and $w$, but the imaginary parts must be related by $$\Im w = - \frac2n \Im z$$ for some $n\in\mathbb N$ wich will double as the number of terms minus one (since we sum from $k=0$ to $n$, wich has $n+1$ summands)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.