A curve is given in cylindrical coordinates:




The curve is unit-speed:


How do we find the principal unit normal vector to this curve? Many thanks!


Since we have

$$\vec r'\cdot \vec r'=1 \tag 1$$

then differentiating $(1)$ with respect to $t$ shows that

$$\vec r'' \cdot \vec r'=0. \tag 2$$

Note that $(2)$ implies that $\vec r'$ and $\vec r''$ are orthogonal.

We also know that $\vec r'$ is tangent to the curve spanned by $\vec r$. Thus, $\vec r''$ in a normal to the curve.

For cylindrical coordinates, we have $\vec r=\hat r r+\hat zz$.


$$\vec r'=\hat r r'+\hat \theta r\theta'+\hat zz'$$


$$\vec r''=\hat r[r''-r(\theta')^2]+\hat \theta[2r'\theta'+r\theta'']+\hat zz''.$$

To verify that indeed $\vec r'\cdot \vec r''=0$, we form the inner product to find

$$\begin{align} \vec r'\cdot \vec r''&=r'r''-rr'(\theta')^2+2rr'(\theta')^2+r^2\theta' \theta''+z'z''\\\\ &=rr''+rr'(\theta')^2+r^2\theta' \theta''+z'z''\\\\ &=2\frac{d}{dt}\left(r'^2+r^2(\theta')^2+z'^2\right)\\\\ &=0 \end{align}$$

as expected

  • $\begingroup$ Dr. MV, thank you for taking time to answer this question!. I hear your reasoning; it is the established way to finding the normal in Cartesian coordinates. My issue is with the cylindrical coordinate system, because even though the curve is unit-speed in Cartesian coordinates via $|r^{\prime}|=1$, this same expression is no longer true in cylindrical coordinates. Also in cylindrical coordinates, $r^{\prime\prime}\cdot r^{\prime}$ is not zero. Where is my mistake? $\endgroup$ – Jay May 26 '15 at 17:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Jay You're welcome. My pleasure. Note that the development is independent of a coordinate system and thus applies to cylindrical coordinates as well as Cartesian coordinates. $\endgroup$ – Mark Viola May 26 '15 at 17:06
  • $\begingroup$ Then my mistake is in writing ${\mathbf r}$ improperly. I wrote ${\mathbf r} = r \hat{r} + \theta \hat{\theta} + z \hat{z}$. $\endgroup$ – Jay May 26 '15 at 17:18
  • $\begingroup$ If there is a good textbook that explains the position vector in cylindrical coordinates and its derivatives I would be happy to read more. $\endgroup$ – Jay May 26 '15 at 17:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Jay I understand the reason why it is tempting to add the $\hat \theta \theta$ term to the position vector. But, if one simply takes $\vec r=\hat xx+\hat yy+\hat zz$ and uses $\hat x=\hat r \cos \theta-\hat \theta \sin \theta$ and $\hat y=\hat r \sin \theta+\hat \theta \cos \theta$ along with $x=r\cos \theta$ and $y=r\sin \theta$, one finds that $\vec r=\hat r r+\hat zz$. Alternatively, one can intuit this by drawing a picture and identifying that for the position vector, there is no $\hat \theta$ component. $\endgroup$ – Mark Viola May 26 '15 at 17:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.