1
$\begingroup$

When i first learned about limit i was taught that the limit $\lim \limits_{x \to a}$ f(x) = L exists if f(x) $\rightarrow$ L when x $\rightarrow$ a. Or that f(x) gets arbitrarily close to L when x gets arbitrarily close to a.

After leaning this intuitive but not rigorous definition, I looked at the delta epsilon definition. In the next paragraph i will try to relate the epsilon delta definition back to the first intuitive definition(ps: i'm not very familiar with mathy terms like "tolerance" or "error" etc, but i hope you understand me regardless.

The epsilon delta definition states, more or less, that if $\lim \limits_{x \to a}$ f(x) = L is true, then for every range $\epsilon$ around L, there exists some range $\delta$ around a such that all the points within $\delta$ of a evaluates to functions that are within $\epsilon$ of L. So if we set $\epsilon$ arbitrarily close to 0 , (1) then if we find a wide or big $\delta$ around a, it means that every function of those x'es within $\delta$ must be arbitrarily close to L, and that includes the x'es that are arbitrarily close to a. So the statement f(x) $\rightarrow$ L when x $\rightarrow$ a is true. (2) And if the $\delta$ is arbitrarily small when $\epsilon$ is arbitrarily small, it follows that f(x) $\rightarrow$ L when x $\rightarrow$ a

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ $\epsilon$ gets close to $0$, not to $L$. $\endgroup$ – Funktorality May 26 '15 at 4:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By "$\displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} = L$" did you mean to write "$\displaystyle\lim_{x \to a}f(x) = L$"? $\endgroup$ – JimmyK4542 May 26 '15 at 4:41
  • $\begingroup$ I think i meant, $\epsilon$ gets close to L such that |$\epsilon$-L| is arbitrarily small, but ill edit. $\endgroup$ – plebian May 26 '15 at 4:42
  • $\begingroup$ Yes my bad, edited now. $\endgroup$ – plebian May 26 '15 at 4:44
  • $\begingroup$ I would say the essential is that there is a real number $L$ such that to any given degree, we can locally majorize $|f(x) - L|$. In this case, we write $f(x) \to L$ as $x \to a.$ $\endgroup$ – Megadeth May 26 '15 at 4:46
1
$\begingroup$

You're mostly right.

First, $\epsilon$ can get arbitrarily close to $0$, not $L$. In the definition we write

$$ \left | f(x) - L \right | < \epsilon $$

So $L$ does not have anything to do with the value of $\epsilon$ directly.

Also, there is no requirement for $\delta$ to be arbitrarily small. The best way to understand $\delta$ is to consider it as a function of $\epsilon$ (i.e. $\delta(\epsilon)$). You may (or may not) have a different $\delta$ for each $\epsilon$, and these may not get arbitrarily small; the only requirements are that it is positive, and that the function's value $f(x)$ stays within a distance of $\epsilon$ from $L$ as long as $x$ stays within a distance of $\delta$ from $a$.

For example given a constant function like $f(x) = 2$ (whose limit is obviously $2$ at $x = 0$ or any other point) $\delta$ can be any positive number for each $\epsilon$, since the function never "moves away" from $2$. So we could prove the limit by setting $\delta(\epsilon) = \frac{1}{\epsilon}$, which will get arbitrarily large as $\epsilon \to 0$!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.