1
$\begingroup$

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_relation it is first defined as "a collection of ordered pairs of elements of A" and then as "an ordered triple (X, Y, G) where X and Y are arbitrary sets (or classes), and G is a subset of the Cartesian product X × Y. The sets X and Y are called the domain (or the set of departure) and codomain (or the set of destination), respectively, of the relation, and G is called its graph." What is the correct definition of it? Also according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_%28mathematics%29 a function is a relation between a set of inputs and a set of permissible outputs with the property that each input is related to exactly one output. How a function can be a relation between sets? Shouldn't it be a relation on sets? Because defined like this, one can think of a function as an object that relates an input x to output f(x) while what it really is is an ordered triple (X, Y, G). Is there anything significant behind these definitions or it's just abuse of definitions and words?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I would recommend you split this question into one about equivalence relations and one about functions. $\endgroup$ – Johanna May 25 '15 at 1:29
3
$\begingroup$

You have many questions, I'll try to adress them all.

A binary relation, as you read is just some set $R$ which is a subset of the cartesian product of two sets $A$ and $B$, that is $R \subseteq A\times B$.

An example may ilustrate this:

Let $A=\{\dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,\dots \}$ (the set of even numbers), $B=\{1,3,5\}$.

Then a relation $R_1$ could be $R_1=\{(-4,1),(-4,3)(0,5)\}$

We usually denote a pair $(a,b)$ of a relation with the notation $aRb$ meaning a is related with b.

A function is a relation between two elements of two given sets condition that for each element in the domain there's one and only one image(*).

(*)That is: if $R$ is a function, $x_1\in Dom(f)$ and $y_1,y_2\in Im(f)$, $$ x_1Ry_1 \wedge x_1Ry_2 \iff y_1=y_2 $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand. How can a function be a relation between two elements of two given sets when a relation is a set? $\endgroup$ – LearningMath May 25 '15 at 2:33
  • $\begingroup$ Do you understand the concept of a cartesian product? To give you an example, lets say we define a function $f: \Bbb{N} \rightarrow \Bbb{Z}: f(x)=-x^2$. We can denote this function as a set of ordered pairs of the form $(x,f(x))$, in this case: $(x,-x^2)$. The set being some set $R=\{(1,-1),(2,-4),(3,-9),...\}$ describes completely this function. $\endgroup$ – YoTengoUnLCD May 25 '15 at 2:51
  • $\begingroup$ It seems I am not so good with words. Lets try this way: We define the word relation to denote a subset of the cartesian product $A \times B$. Now you say that a function is a relation between two elements of two given sets, in other words, "a set between two elements of two given sets" and i think this has no meaning. If a function is a relation (subset of $A \times B$), then you can say that an element (a,b) is in the set, where a is an element of A and b of B, and that 'a' relates to 'b'. Am I right? $\endgroup$ – LearningMath May 25 '15 at 3:03
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, the only thing missing (and the most important to the concept of a function) is that for every $a \in A$ there exists a unique $b \in B$ such that $f(a)=b$, that is why a relation like x=y^2 is not a function. I'm sorry if I made my answer unclear, I'll try to rephrase it. $\endgroup$ – YoTengoUnLCD May 25 '15 at 3:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.