3
$\begingroup$

Given a normed space $X$ and assume it is also a locally convex space in some other topology (e.g. weak or weak* if it's a dual). Assume that the unit ball $B_X$ is separable in this topology. Is it then true that the $X$ is separable in this topology?

I think that this is true. Let $D\subset B_X$ be dense. Then $\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}} n D $ is dense in $X$, right?

My attempt for the proof: Given $x\in X$, then $\frac{1}{N} x \in B_X$ for some $N$ large enough. Now there exists a sequence $(y_n)_n \subset D$ such that $y_n \to \frac{1}{N}x$ as $n\to\infty$. Hence $N y_n \to x$ and clearly $Ny_n \in N D$.

Remark: In my definition of a LCS, the topology is also Hausdorff.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your proof looks good to me. $\endgroup$ – icurays1 May 23 '15 at 20:04
  • $\begingroup$ Does this also work if the topology is not first countable? E.g. weak/weak* topology. $\endgroup$ – Peter May 23 '15 at 20:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let me get this straight. You said that $(X,\tau)$ (where $\tau$ is not necessairly the topology induced by the norm) is locally convex. Moreover, $(B_X,\tau_{B_X})$ is separable. You want to show that $(X,\tau)$ is separable, am I right? $\endgroup$ – user228113 May 23 '15 at 20:08
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, exactly. That's what I want to do. $\endgroup$ – Peter May 23 '15 at 20:09
2
$\begingroup$

Your proof is fine. You constructed a countable subset of $E\subset X$, then proved that each $x\in X$ has a sequence $(y_n)\subset E$ such that $y_n\rightarrow x$ in your topology. You use the linearity of $X$ and the separability of $B_X$ to construct $E$ and $y_n$, and the Hausdorff condition (implicitly) to prove that $y_n\rightarrow x$. There's nothing hiding under the covers!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.