Question 1

Let $E/F$ be an algebraic field extension. Let $K$ be the set of all elements of $E$ that are purely inseparable over $F$. Then, $E/K/F$ is a tower of fields, and $K/F$ is purely inseparable.

In this case, is $E/K$ always separable? If not, what is a counterexample?

Moreover, let $K^s$ and $F^s$ be the separable closures in $E$. Then, $E/K^s$ is purely inseparable. How different are $K^s$ and $F^s$ as fields? That is, how much nicer is the extension $K^s/K$ compared to $F^s/F$?

Question 2

Let $E/F$ be a normal field extension. Let $E^G$ denote the fixed field of $\operatorname{Aut}(E/F)$. Then, $E/E^G$ is separable and $E^G/F$ is purely inseperable.

Is $E^G$ the unique such subextension? That is, is there a subextension $K$ of $F$ such that $E/K$ is separable and $K/F$ is purely inseparable, but $K\neq E^G$?


The extension $E/K$ need not be separable. Here is the example I learned from a note by J. Lipman.

Consider the rational function field $F=\mathbb{F}_2(y,z)$ and the extension $E=F(x)$, where $x$ is a root of $$f(t)=t^4+yt^2+z\in F[t].$$ If $E/K$ was separable, we would have $f=g^2$, for $g\in K[t]$. We have $g=t^2+\sqrt{y}t+\sqrt{z}$, which means that $\sqrt{x},\sqrt{y}\in K$. The latter condition says that $K/F$ is a degree-four extension, and so it is not purely inseparable.

  • $\begingroup$ Isn’t $K=F$ in this example? $\endgroup$ – Lubin May 24 '15 at 22:43
  • $\begingroup$ @Lubin Yes. In other words, no element of $E$ is purely inseparable over $F$. $\endgroup$ – user2097 May 25 '15 at 19:43

Answer to Question 1.

Here is another example of an extension $K/F$ such that $K/I$ is not separable, where $I$ is the purely inseparable closure of $F$ in $K$. This is Example 4.24 from Patrick Morandi's Field and Galois Theory (pages 48-49), and it is similar in spirit to the one mentioned in @user2097's answer.

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $2$. Let $F = k(x,y)$ where $x$ and $y$ are indeterminates. Let $S = F(u)$, where $u$ is a root of the polynomial $$ t^2 + t + x \in F[t]. $$ Let $K = S(\sqrt{uy})$. Then $K/S$ is purely inseparable and $S/F$ is separable, so $S$ is the separable closure of $F$ in $K$. But the purely inseparable closure of $F$ in $K$ equals $F$ itself, and so $K$ is not separable over $I$.

I cannot provide a strong answer for how much nicer $I^s/I$ is compared to $F^s/F$. Perhaps you would receive better answers if you asked it separately, either here or on MathOverflow.

Answer to Question 2.

Note that for any algebraic extension $E/F$, we have that $E/E^G$ is separable and that $E^G \supset I$, and if $E/F$ is normal, then $E^G = I$.

Now, let $E/F$ be a normal extension, and let $K$ be an intermediate extension such that $E/K$ is separable and $K/F$ is purely inseparable. Then, we have the chain of extensions $$ F \subset K \subset I \subset E. $$ Since $E/K$ is separable and $E/I = E/E^G$ is separable, $I/K$ is also separable. But $I/F$ is purely inseparable, so $I/K$ is also purely inseparable. Hence, $I = K$. Thus, if $E/F$ is normal, then there is a unique intermediate extension such that $E/F$ splits into a purely inseparable extension followed by a separable extension, namely $I = E^G$.

If $E/F$ is not necessarily normal, then there may not exist such an intermediate extension at all. If it does exist, then that intermediate extension is unique and equals $I$, but $E^G$ need not equal $I$ in this case! This follows from the results in the note of J. Lipman that @user2097 mentioned in their answer.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.