3
$\begingroup$

I have a system of equations like the below:

$$x + 3y - z = a \\ x + y + 2z = b \\ 2y - 3z = c$$

And have put it in an augmented matrix:

$$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 & -1 & a \\ 1 & 1 & 2 & b \\ 0 & 2 & -3 & c\end{bmatrix}$$

I need to find the conditions where the system is consistent (values of $a$, $b$, and $c$ whereby the system has a solution).

I've attempted to reduce the matrix to row echelon form, but the last column is getting quite crazy. I have to wonder what I should do (if this is even the correct start) once it is reduced: I am left with things like:

$$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & \text{a mess}\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & \text{a mess}\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & \text{a mess}\end{bmatrix}$$

If (or when) I get to the endpoint, and only if this is the right methodology, how do I determine the values of $a$, $b$, and $c$ in relation to $z_1$, $z_2$, and $z_3$?

$\endgroup$
11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is this an augmented matrix? $\endgroup$ May 19, 2015 at 7:22
  • $\begingroup$ you have copied the question wrong, check your steps. $\endgroup$
    – UNM
    May 19, 2015 at 7:27
  • $\begingroup$ @UNM I've corrected the typo. $\endgroup$
    – gator
    May 19, 2015 at 7:28
  • $\begingroup$ your row reduced is not the same after correcting the typo. $\endgroup$
    – UNM
    May 19, 2015 at 7:31
  • $\begingroup$ @UNM, I'm sorry but I don't follow. I did not show the reduced matrix, just a theoretical endpoint I am approaching. I haven't yet got to this stage, I'm just curious if I'm going about it correctly in the first place. $\endgroup$
    – gator
    May 19, 2015 at 7:33

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

HINT:

How can a system be inconsistent? Try to think about how does this look on the reduced matrix of the system.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Call me naive, but I don't see how this helps. An inconsistent system is where two of the formulae conflict (such as $4x = 2$ and $3x = 5$). $\endgroup$
    – gator
    May 19, 2015 at 7:26
  • $\begingroup$ Inconsistency can be seen from the matrix when you have a row such that the variable coefficients are zero but the "free" coefficient is non-zero. Can this happen here? (I'm assuming this is an augmented matrix). $\endgroup$
    – Daniel
    May 19, 2015 at 7:28
  • $\begingroup$ This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. $\endgroup$ May 19, 2015 at 7:44
  • $\begingroup$ @PeterWoolfitt I'm trying to give a subtle hint that hopefully will help. If it doesn't help, I wait for the OP to comment and explain himself. If you request this answer to be deleted, I'll do it without a problem. $\endgroup$
    – Daniel
    May 19, 2015 at 7:48
  • $\begingroup$ @SolidSnake I'm sorry, it looks like I reviewed this too hastily. I interpreted your answer as another question posted as an answer (in particular I interpreted it to mean you were asking for a clarification of the OP's definition of inconsistent which should be a comment). Could you perhaps change your answer to make it not look like a short question? Perhaps changing it to "Think about what makes a system inconsistent." Still, it was completely my fault - I should have been clued in by the fact that you said hint. $\endgroup$ May 19, 2015 at 7:54
1
$\begingroup$

After you row-reduce the matrix, observe that you get all zeros in the original part of the matrix and an expression of a,b and c in the augmented part in the last row. So for the consistency of the solution the expression in a,b and c has to be zero in the last row.That's the condition.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.