1
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ and $Y$ be Banach spaces and $T : D(T) \rightarrow Y$ a linear operator where $D(T)$ is a linear subspace of $X$.

i) Let $T$ be closed and injective. Show that $T^{-1}$ is closed.

I tried using the Bounded Inverse Theorem to no avail. Any ideas how to go about this part.

ii) Let $1 \le p \lt \infty$. Suppose $T : D(T) \rightarrow l^p; x = (x_k) \rightarrow (kx_k)$ where $D(T)$ consists of all $x = (x_k)_{k \ge 1}$ in $l^p$ having only finitely many non-zero terms.

Show $T$ is not closed and find a closed linear extension of $T$, and prove it is closed.

I am happy showing $T$ is closed and know that an extension should be the act like $T$ on $D(T)$ but has a domain which is a superset of $D(T)$. Otherwise again I'm just stuck.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Recall: What does it mean that an operator is closed? How are the graphs of $T$ and $T^{-1}$ related? $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer May 18 '15 at 13:39
1
$\begingroup$

Recall that an operator is closed if a sequence $(x_{n})\subset D(T)$ converges to some $x\in X$ and $Tx_{n}$ converges to $y\in Y$ implies $x\in D(T)$. Equivalently, the graph of $T$ is closed in the direct sum $X\oplus Y$.

Proof of i). Since $T$ is injective, we can define a linear operator $T^{-1}$ on the range of $T$, denoted $R(T)$, by $T^{-1}y=x$, where $y=Tx$. Let $y_{n}=(Tx_{n})\subset D(T^{-1})=R(T)$ be a sequence such that $y_{n}\rightarrow y\in Y$ and $T^{-1}y_{n}\rightarrow x\in X$. But since $y_{n}=Tx_{n}$ for a sequence $(x_{n})\subset D(T)$, it follows from the hypothesis that $T$ is closed that $x\in D(T)$ and $y=Tx$. Whence, $x=T^{-1}y$.

Proof of ii). To see that $T$ is not closed, consider the sequence formed by the truncations to the first $n$ components of a suitable element $x\in\ell^{p}$.

Define an operator $\bar{T}:D(\bar{T})\rightarrow\ell^{p}$ as follows. Let

$$D(\bar{T}):=\left\{x=(x_{k})\in\ell^{p} : (kx_{k})_{k}\in\ell^{p}\right\}$$

and define $\bar{T}x=(kx_{k})_{k}$. It is evident that $\bar{T}$ is linear and is an extension of $T$.

To see that $\bar{T}$ is closed, let $x^{(n)}=(x_{k}^{(n)})_{k}$ be a sequence in $D(\bar{T})$ converging to $x\in\ell^{p}$ such that $Tx^{n}\rightarrow y\in\ell^{p}$. I claim that $x=(k^{-1}y_{k})_{k}$. Indeed,

$$\sum_{k}\left|x_{k}^{(n)}-k^{-1}y_{k}\right|^{p}\leq\sum_{k}k^{p}\left|x_{k}^{(n)}-k^{-1}y_{k}\right|^{p}=\sum_{k}\left|kx_{k}^{(n)}-y_{k}\right|^{p}\rightarrow 0, \ n\rightarrow\infty$$

The claim follows from the uniqueness of limits. Clearly, $x\in\ell^{p}$ and $(kx_{k})\in\ell^{p}$, whence $x\in D(\bar{T})$ and $\bar{T}x=y$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thank you this was very helpful $\endgroup$ – user108896 May 18 '15 at 16:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.