1
$\begingroup$

Assume $(a_n)$ is a Cauchy sequence, then it is bounded. By Bolzanno-Weierstrass theorem, there is a convergent sub-sequence $(a_{n_j})$; denote its limit as $a$. Thus we have the following: for every $\epsilon>0$, there exists a $N_1\in \mathbb{N}$ such that $$n,m \geq N_1 \implies |a_n-a_m|<\frac{\epsilon}{2},$$ and $N_2$ such that $$n_j \geq N_2 \implies |a_{n_j}-a|<\frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$

Construct $N$ as follows: $N=\max\{N_1,N_2\}$, thus: $$|a_n-a|=|a_n-a+a_{n_j}-a_{n_j}|\leq|a_n-a_{n_j}|+|a_{n_j}-a|<\frac{\epsilon}{2}+\frac{\epsilon}{2}=\epsilon,$$ whenever $n\geq n_j \geq N$.

I think my first two inequalities are correct, but I am not so sure about the last part. Anyone care to check my work?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hm, I think, that the construction of $N$ might be unnecessary. This is quite confusing. $\endgroup$ – Kurome May 16 '15 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ seems fine to me. what generates your lack of certainty? $\endgroup$ – David Holden May 16 '15 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidHolden The problem is how $N_2$ is chosen, it should be a condition on $j\geq N_2$, not $n_j\geq N_2$. $\endgroup$ – Gregory Grant May 16 '15 at 19:50
  • $\begingroup$ For sub-sequences $n_j \geq j$ (the reason why is quite vague to me, it does seem intuitive though). Thus, $j \geq N_2 \implies n_j \geq N_2$. $\endgroup$ – Kurome May 16 '15 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ @GregoryGrant ah,yes, i see what you mean $\endgroup$ – David Holden May 16 '15 at 19:57
0
$\begingroup$

You're not quite using the subscript notation correct. You don't want to say $n_j\geq N_2$, you want to say $j\geq N_2$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ ... which means we should switch to $N=\max\{N_1,n_{N_2}\}$ $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen May 16 '15 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ I think that's my problem, I'm not quite sure what it means for sub-sequences to converge. $\endgroup$ – Kurome May 16 '15 at 19:47
  • $\begingroup$ Think through an example, like define $b_j$ by $b_j=a_{n_j}=a_{2j}$. Convince yourself how $b_1$ is $a_2$, $b_2$ is $a_4$, etc... Does that help at all? $\endgroup$ – Gregory Grant May 16 '15 at 19:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.