2
$\begingroup$

I have a non-constant degree two map between Riemann surfaces $R$ and $S$, $f: R \to S$. I'm trying to find a holomorphic homeomorphism $\tau: R \to R$ such that $f(\tau) = f$ and $\tau^2$ is the identity.

I think I can define the correct map but I'm struggling to show it is a homeomorphism and holomorphic. Here is what I have so far:

  • $f$ is degree 2 so from the degree formula this means that any point $s \in S$ can have at most 2 pre-images.
  • I think we should say given $r \in R$, $\tau$ should send $r$ to it's pre-image friend $r'$ (where $f(r) = f(r')$) and if $r$ is a ramification point then $\tau$ should do nothing. This would certainly satisfy the properties required of $\tau$ and it's defined on the whole of $R$.
  • To show this $\tau$ is holomorphic I understand we need to show it is holomorphic as a map in local coordinates. So we pick a neighbourhood $U$ small enough of $r$ so that $f$ can be written in local form in $U$. I was thinking of somehow using $f$ to help us define a local coordinate in which $\tau$ is holomorphic and homeomorphic but I'm struggling to get anywhere with this.

Thanks for any help

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

By construction, $\tau$ is its own inverse, so when we've shown that $\tau$ is holomorphic, it follows that $\tau$ is a homeomorphism.

Consider a point $r\in R$ such that $f^{-1}(f(r)) = \{ r, r'\}$ has two elements. Using charts around $r,r'$ and $f(r)$, we find that there are open neighbourhoods $U,V$ of $r$ and $f(r)$ respectively, such that $f\lvert_U \colon U \to V$ is biholomorphic, and there are neighbourhoods $U', V'$ of $r'$ resp. $f(r') = f(r)$ such that $f\lvert_{U'}\colon U' \to V'$ is biholomorphic. By restricting the neighbourhoods, we can assume that $V' = V$. Then on $U$ we have

$$\tau\lvert_U = (f\lvert_{U'})^{-1}\circ (f\lvert_U),$$

which shows that $\tau$ is holomorphic on $U$ (and a local biholomorphism).

It remains to consider ramification points. If $r$ is a ramification point, there are local charts around $r$ and $f(r)$ in which $f$ corresponds to $z \mapsto z^2$. It follows that on such a chart around $r$, $\tau$ corresponds to $z \mapsto -z$, which again is holomorphic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you - this is really helpful. When we choose the charts around $r$ and $r'$ how can we ensure $f$ is biholomorphic there? it seems that points near $x$ and $x'$ all map into the same point and $f$ is 2-1 there? I'm also struggling to see why $-z$ isn't a different point to x in the local coordinates you described? $\endgroup$ – Wooster May 14 '15 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ Is it correct that the local form on $U$ and $U'$ is $z$ which is a biholomorphism? Even though the global form of $f$ is 2-1 around there? $\endgroup$ – Wooster May 14 '15 at 14:43
  • $\begingroup$ For the case where $f(r)$ has two distinct preimages, we start by picking two disjoint neighbourhoods $U_0$ of $r$ and $U'_0$ of $r'$. Applying the open mapping theorem, we see there is a neighbourhood $V$ of $f(r)$ such that every $s\in V$ is attained in $U_0$ and in $U'_0$. Let $U = f^{-1}(V) \cap U_0$ and $U' = f^{-1}(V) \cap U'_0$ to see that $f$ is injective on the neighbourhoods $U$ of $r$ and $U'$ of $r'$ [since $f$ is globally two-to-one, counting multiplicities], and $f(U) = f(U') = V$, and bijective holomorphic maps are biholomorphic. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer May 14 '15 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ For the ramification points, choose the charts so that $r$ and $f(r)$ correspond to $0$. $f$ cannot be injective on any neighbourhood of $r$, or $r$ wouldn't be a ramification point. Since $f$ is two-to-one, the local form of $f$ is $\psi(f(\varphi^{-1}(z))) = z^2$, where we can pick our charts so that the neighbourhoods correspond to the unit disk. Then $z \mapsto -z$ corresponds to a map - $p \mapsto \varphi^{-1}(-\varphi(p))$ - fixing $r$ and no other point in a (small enough) neighbourhood of $r$. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer May 14 '15 at 15:02
  • $\begingroup$ Okay I understand the case where we have two distinct pre-images, thanks! So for a ramification point our map is $\tau(r) = r$ - and in a neigbhourhood of $r$ this should not be the identity because ramification points are isolated. Now I'm struggling to see why (in local coordinates) our map is forced to be $z \to -z$? $\endgroup$ – Wooster May 14 '15 at 15:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.