I'm reading something, and don't understand why a certain equality comes up.

Suppose $u:\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}\to\mathbb{R}$ given by $u(z)=\ln(|z|^2)$ is a harmonic function. We want to see if $u$ has a harmonic conjugate $v$. If it does, then $f=u+iv$ is holomorphic.

But then I read that since the differential of $f$ is complex linear, then $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}f(re^{i\theta})=i\frac{\partial}{\partial r}f(re^{i\theta}). $$

I don't follow this. Even writing it out with the chain rule in terms of $u$ and $v$ doesn't make it clear to me. Why does this equality follow? Thanks.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There seems to be missing a factor of $r$ to the right of the $=$. $\endgroup$ – hmakholm left over Monica Apr 5 '12 at 0:12

I think this is an error in what you're reading. You can see that without going into details simply because $\partial/\partial r$ has units of inverse length whereas $\partial/\partial \theta$ doesn't. The derivatives are

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}f(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})=\frac{\partial(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})}{\partial\theta}f'(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})=r\mathrm i\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta}f'(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})$$


$$\frac{\partial}{\partial r}f(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})=\frac{\partial(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})}{\partial r}f'(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})=\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta}f'(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})\;,$$

so the correct relationship is

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}f(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})=r\mathrm i\frac{\partial}{\partial r}f(r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta})\;.$$

  • $\begingroup$ Thank makes sense, thanks. $\endgroup$ – ankitha Apr 5 '12 at 0:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.