4
$\begingroup$

I would like to convert a rectangular beam shape given in Horizontal and Vertical beam angle, into solid angle representing the surface area in steradians of projected light. For example a light projection that has a 120° H beam by 5° Vertical beam pattern.

It would be helpful if this could be represented in a geometric form that can be used in an Excel Spreadsheet that allows one to input a horizontal beam angle and a vertical beam angle and then output the area in steradians. Given that a sphere has $4\pi$ sr and a hemisphere is $2\pi$ sr I was approaching this for example above that 120°=3.1414 sr or 1/3 of a sphere, and 5°= 0.00597 sr, I thought if there are 120 sections of 5° vertical sections this becomes a total area of 0.7164 sr. Then second guess I thought that there are only 24 vertical sections that are 5 degrees wide in the total horizontal area of 120° area. That yields only 0.1435 sr which seems unbelievably small. I came to the conclusion I need help and found this forum trying to find the solution.

I reviewed many questions that are similar. This is my first post, and I'd appreciate any help and guidance trying to figure where I have gone wrong in the application. Thank you in advance

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Consider a beam with a rectangular profile, having horizontal & vertical beam angles $\theta_{H}$ & $\theta_{V}$, emitted by a uniform point source S (as shown in the figure below). Then consider an imaginary rectangular plane with center O, length $l$ & width $b$ at a normal distance $h$ from the point-source S, then the solid angle ($\omega$) by the rectangular plane at the point-source S is given by $$\omega=4\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{lb}{\sqrt{(l^2+4h^2)(b^2+4h^2)}}\right)$$ (Note: For derivation of the above formula, kindly go through HCR's Theory of Polygon)

Using geometry in right $\Delta SOP$ from the figure, we get $$l=2h\tan\frac{\theta_{H}}{2}$$ Similarly, in right $\Delta SOM$, we get $$b=2h\tan\frac{\theta_{V}}{2}$$

Rectangular shape beam

Now, substituting these values in the formula, we get $$\omega=4\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{2h\tan\frac{\theta_{H}}{2}2h\tan\frac{\theta_{V}}{2}}{\sqrt{\left(\left(2h\tan\frac{\theta_{H}}{2}\right)^2+4h^2\right)\left(\left(2h\tan\frac{\theta_{V}}{2}\right)^2+4h^2\right)}}\right)$$ $$=4\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{\tan\frac{\theta_{H}}{2}\tan\frac{\theta_{V}}{2}}{\sec\frac{\theta_{H}}{2}\sec\frac{\theta_{V}}{2}}\right)=4\sin^{-1}\left(\sin\frac{\theta_{H}}{2}\sin\frac{\theta_{V}}{2}\right)$$ Where, $0\leq\theta_{H}, \theta_{V}\leq\pi$

If $\theta_{H}, \theta_{V}>\pi$ apply the following formula to calculate solid angle $$\omega=4\pi-4\sin^{-1}\left(\sin\frac{\theta_{H}}{2}\sin\frac{\theta_{V}}{2}\right)$$

(Note: For more detailed explanation, kindly go through Radiometry & Photometry by H.C. Rajpoot)

As per numerical values provided in your question, the solid angle $\omega$ (i.e. area covered\intercepted by rectangular beam shape on a unit spherical surface), subtended by the rectangular beam shape having horizontal & vertical beam angles $\theta_{H}=120^o=\frac{2\pi}{3}$ & $\theta_{V}=5^o=\frac{\pi}{36}$ at the point-source S, is given as follows $$\omega=4\sin^{-1}\left(\sin\frac{\frac{2\pi}{3}}{2}\sin\frac{\frac{\pi}{36}}{2}\right)=4\sin^{-1}\left(\sin\frac{\pi}{3}\sin\frac{\pi}{72}\right)\approx 0.15113795 \space sr$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer, I appreciate your response and now will try to work through it. I also appreciate the reference links. I can appreciate the rectangular reference you made, but was unsure how to translate that to a spherical system. I will respond again, but for now I wanted to say thank you for your effort to help me through this. $\endgroup$ – luminary May 19 '15 at 0:49
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @ Luminary, In case, $\theta_{H}, \theta_{V}>\pi$ you can subtract the smaller value obtained by formula from $4\pi$. You can also see the correction for limits I put in the answer. $\endgroup$ – Harish Chandra Rajpoot May 19 '15 at 13:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ Luminary, As you have mentioned that the profile of beam is rectangular. Thus no beam with rectangular profile can subtend a solid angle greater than $2\pi\space sr$ at the point-source. The reason is that for angles greater that $180^o$, the rectangular profile (beam front similar to a wave front) traverses on other side of the point-source sweeping an imaginary half sphere that you are consider as the rear part of beam which is actually not associated with rectangular beam profile. So if you still want to apply the formula for angles more than $180^o$ then it can be modified. $\endgroup$ – Harish Chandra Rajpoot May 19 '15 at 14:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ Luminary, For your kind attention, the solid angle is subtended by an object (2-D or 3-D) only at a point in the space. How to define the solid angle subtended by a beam at multiple sources or a linear source as you mentioned under the scenario? $\endgroup$ – Harish Chandra Rajpoot May 19 '15 at 14:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In actual practice the point-sources are not possible but the extended sources for longer distances & the smaller sources for usual distances may be assumed to be the point-sources for analysis purpose & practical applications. $\endgroup$ – Harish Chandra Rajpoot May 19 '15 at 14:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.