2
$\begingroup$

I am asked to prove subject along with its converse (which I can do). I would appreciate any assistance based on my progress below in proving the separation conditions hold in the situation I have constructed. Thanks!

DEFINITIONS

$\textbf{completely normal}$: every subspace is normal

$\textbf{separated}$: $A$ and $B$ are separated if and only if $\overline{A}\cap B=\varnothing=A\cap\overline{B}$

PROVE: If for every pair of separated sets $A$ and $B$ in $X$ there exist disjoint open sets containing them, then $X$ is completely normal.

IDEAS:

Let $Y$ be a subspace of $X$ and let $A$ and $B$ be disjoint closed sets in $Y$. It must be shown there exist disjoint open sets $U$ and $V$ in $Y$ containing $A$ and $B$ (respectively). First show $A$ an $B$ are separated.

$\textit{This is where I need help...}$

idea 1: Since $A$ and $B$ are closed in $Y$, there exist closed sets $A_X$ and $B_X$ in $X$ such that $A_X\cap Y=A$ and $B_X\cap Y=B$. Since $A_X$ and $B_Y$ are closed in $X$, then $\overline{A_X}=A_X$ and $\overline{B_X}=B_X$.

idea 2: The sets $A$ and $B$ may not be closed in $X$, so let $\overline{A}$ and $\overline{B}$ be their closures in $X$. Then $\overline{A}\cap Y=A$ and $\overline{B}\cap Y=B$.

$\textit{This is where I need to prove $A$ and $B$ are separated...}$

Since $A$ and $B$ are separated, there exist disjoint open sets $U'$ and $V'$ in $X$ containing $A$ and $B$ respectively by hypothesis. Then $U=U'\cap Y$ and $V=V'\cap Y$ are disjoint open sets in $Y$ containing $A$ and $B$ respectively so $Y$ is normal and $X$ is completely normal since $Y$ was an arbitrary subset of $X$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Does this make sense? Let $\overline{A}$ and $\overline{B}$ be the closures of $A$ and $B$ in $X$. Then $A=\overline{A}\cap Y$ and $B=\overline{B}\cap Y$. Since $A\cap B=\varnothing$, then $A\cap B=(\overline{A}\cap Y)\cap B=\overline{A}\cap(Y\cap B)=\overline{A}\cap B=\varnothing$ where $Y\cap B=B$ because $B$ is completely contained in $Y$. Use the same process for the other desired condition. $\endgroup$ – fullyhip May 13 '15 at 18:07
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, what you have in your comment is exactly what you need in order to complete the proof. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott May 13 '15 at 22:12
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent! Thank you so very much! $\endgroup$ – fullyhip May 14 '15 at 21:21
  • $\begingroup$ You’re welcome! $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott May 14 '15 at 21:27
0
$\begingroup$

Let $A,B$ be closed in $Y$ then $A=U\cap Y ,B=V\cap Y$ $U,V $ are closed in $X$

Also $\overline U_X\cap V=U\cap V=\emptyset;\overline V_X\cap U=U\cap V=\emptyset$

Thus $U,V$ are weakly separated in $X$ Thus $\exists $ open sets $P,Q\in X$ such that $U\subset P;V\subset Q;P\cap Q=\emptyset $

Thus $U\cap Y\subset P\cap Y;V\cap Y\subset Q\cap Y$ where $P\cap Y,Q\cap Y$ open in $Y$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Unfortunately weakly separated is not a topic covered in my book, so I doubt my professor would be happy with that answer. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – fullyhip May 13 '15 at 18:10
  • $\begingroup$ @fullyhip: learnmore’s weakly separated is the same as your separated. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott May 13 '15 at 22:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.