Let $ c_0 = \{ x = \{x_n\}_{n \in \mathbb N} \in l^\infty : lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_n = 0\}$. Show that $c_0$ is a Banach space with the norm $\rVert \cdot \lVert_\infty$

I am capable of showing the space where the limit of $x_n$ exists is normed linear space but am having trouble with showing that the limit of Cauchy sequences must converge to 0.

Let $(x^{(n)})_{n \in \mathbb N}$ be a Cauchy sequence in $c_0$ such that $x^{n} = (x^n_1, x^n_2,...)$. Fix $k \in \mathbb N$ consider the sequence $(x^n_k)_{n \in \mathbb N}$ in $\mathbb F$. For any $n,m \in \mathbb N$

$\lvert x^n_k - x^m_k \rvert \le sup_{k \in \mathbb N} \lvert x^n_k - x^m_k \rvert = \lVert x^n - x^m \rVert_\infty \lt \epsilon $ (1)

Thus $x^n_k$ is Cauchy in $\mathbb F$ and so has limit $y_k$ such that $y = (y_1,y_2,...)$ and y is the limit of $x^n$

To show that such a y exists we look at the value of $\lvert y_n - y_m \rvert \le \lvert y_n - x^N_n \rvert + \lvert x^N_n - x^N_m \rvert + \lvert x^N_m - y_m \rvert \lt \epsilon$ for all $n,m \ge N$ (2)

The middle expression on RHS of (2) is $\lt \epsilon/3$ by (1)

The other two are also $\lt \epsilon/3$ follow from $x^N_k$ being Cauchy and converging to $y_k$

This shows that $lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} y_n$ exists but we still have not shown that $y \in c_0$.

I know that to show y tends to 0 i should show that $\lvert y_k \rvert \lt \epsilon$ for $k \ge N$

This is where I am stuck. Perhaps $\lvert y_k \rvert = \lvert lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x^n_k \rvert$ and then we can take the limit function outside the absolute value sign by continuity? Then we might say due to it being a Cauchy sequence $x^n_k \lt \epsilon$. I know this last bit isn't at all convincing so I could do with some help.

  • $\begingroup$ First show $(x^{(n)})$ converges to the pointwise limit $y$ in $\ell_\infty$. Given $\epsilon>0$, choose $N$ so that $\Vert x^{(N)}-y\Vert<\epsilon/2$. Then choose $M$ so that $|x^{(N)}(i)|<\epsilon/2$ for $i>M$. Then $|y(i)|<\epsilon$ for $i>M$ by the triangle inequality. $\endgroup$ – David Mitra May 10 '15 at 16:48

Suppose $x^k \in c_0$ and $x^k \to x$. Let $\epsilon>0$ and pick $N$ such that $\|x^k-x\|_\infty < {1 \over 2 } \epsilon$ for $k \ge N$. Since $x^N \in c_0$, there is some $N'$ such that $|x_i^N| < {1 \over 2 } \epsilon$ for $i \ge N'$. Then $|x_i| \le |x_i^N| +|x_i-x_i^N| \le |x_i^N| +\|x-x^N\|_\infty <\epsilon$. Hence $x_i \to 0$ and so $x \in c_0$.

Hence $c_0$ is a closed subspace of $l_\infty$.

It follows that $c_0$ is Banach since $l_\infty$ is Banach (any Cauchy sequence in $c_0$ is Cauchy in $l_\infty$ hence converges to some point an closedness shows that this point lies in $c_0$).


We note that $$ |y_k| \leq |y_k - x^n_k| + |x^n_k| = \lim_{m→∞}|x^m_k - x^n_k| + |x^n_k| \leq\lim_{m→∞} ‖x^m - x^n‖ + |x^n_k|$$ which holds for arbitrary $n$. (the superscript is which sequence, the subscript is the index of the sequence) As $x^n∈ c_0$, choose $K_n$ large such that $|x^n_k |<ε$ for $k>K_n$.

Pick $N(ε)$ large such that $\|x^m - x^n||<ε $ for $n,m>N$. Taking limits($\star$) gives $$ \lim_{m→∞}‖x^m - x^n‖ \leq ε \quad ∀ n \geq N$$

So putting the two bounds together: With $ε>0$ given, there is $K = K_{N(ε)}$ such that $$ |y_k| \leq \lim_{m→∞} ‖x^m - x^{N(ε)}‖ + |x^{N(ε)}_k| \leq 2ε $$ for all $k > K$.

The step marked $(\star)$ is easy to see if you notationally suppress the $n$: $$ a_m < ε ∀ m > N \implies \lim a_m \leq ε $$ as (you have shown) this limit will exist.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.