6
$\begingroup$

Assume $K/F$ is an inseparable extension. Is it necessary that K contains an element $u \notin F$ that is purely inseparable over $F$?

I also posted in MO.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have a link to the question on MO? I was not able to find it by searching. $\endgroup$
    – user279515
    Jul 8 '19 at 12:53
12
$\begingroup$

The standard counterexample is to consider $F = \mathbf{F}_p(x,y)$ and $K = F(\alpha)$ where $\alpha$ is a root of $f = T^{p^2} + x T^p + y \in F[T]$ (where $f$ is irreducible by Gauss' Lemma). Clearly $K/F$ is non-separable of degree $p^2$ and $F' := F(\alpha^p)$ is a degree-$p$ subextension that is separable over $F$, so this is the maximal separable subextension. Hence, $[K:F]_s = p$ and so $[K:F]_i = p$. To rule out the existence of an element of $K-F$ that is purely inseparable over $F$ it suffices to show that $F'$ is the unique degree-$p$ subextension of $K/F$.

Suppose $E$ is another such subextension, so it must be purely inseparable over $F$ (as otherwise it would be separable and hence the composite $F'E$ would be separable yet has to exhaust $K$ for $F$-degree reasons). By multiplicativity of separable degree in towers, it follows that $[K:E]_s=p$, so the degree-$p$ extension $K/E$ is separable. But $K=E(\alpha)$, so the degree-$p$ minimal polynomial $g \in E[T]$ of $\alpha$ is separable. In a splitting fi eld $E'/E$ of $f$ over $E$, $f$ is a product of $p$th powers of $p$ monic linear factors and $g$ is the product of just these monic linear factors (since $g|f$ in $E[T]$ and $g$ is separable over $E$ of degree $p$).

Hence, in $E'[T]$ we must have $g^p=f$. But this latter equality then must hold in $E[T]$ as well. It then follows that $g = T^p + uT + v$ for some $u, v \in E$ satisfying $u^p = x, v^p = y$. But the extension $\mathbf{F}_p(x^{1/p}, y^{1/p}) \supset F$ has degree $p^2$ and so cannot lie inside the degree-$p$ extension $E$ of $F$. This is a contradiction, so no such $E \ne F'$ exists inside $K/F$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I wrote my answer above after some explicit computations and I was wondering about a more abstract approach. $\endgroup$
    – Daniele A
    May 11 '15 at 8:48
  • $\begingroup$ Lipman wrote a short paper ("Balanced Field Extensions," Amer. Math. Monthly 73 (1966), 373-374) about the algebraic extensions that are separable extensions of inseparable extensions and at the end he gives a counterexample that is precisely this construction when $p = 2$ except he allows any field of characteristic $p$ in place of $\mathbf F_p$, which of course works in the above answer as well. $\endgroup$
    – KCd
    Jun 27 '15 at 23:56
4
$\begingroup$

I think this is one of the counterexamples mentioned by grghxy on MO : take $F=\mathbb{F}_2(x,y)$ and consider in $F[t]$ the polynomial $f(t)=t^4+xt^2+y$. Using Gauss' Lemma for example it is easy to see that $f(t)$ is irreducible in $F[t]$, and then we can take the field extension $K= F(\alpha)=F[t]/(f(t))$. This is a degree $4$ extension and it is inseparable, since $f'(t)=0$. Now we want to show that no element $\beta \in K$ is purely inseparable over $F$. Suppose that $\beta \in K$ is purely inseparable over $F$: since $[K:F]=4$ it must be either $\beta^2\in F$ or $\beta^4\in F$. We can write $$ \beta = a_0 + a_1\alpha +a_2\alpha^2 + a_3\alpha^3 \qquad a_i \in F $$ and then after some computations (I hope they are correct) one can see that $$ \beta^2 = [a_0^2+a_2^2+a_3^2xy] + [a_1^2+a_2^2x+a_3^2x^2+a_3^2y]\alpha^2 $$ so that $\beta^2\in F$ if and only if $$ a_1^2+a_2^2x+a_3^2x^2+a_3^2y=0 $$ Multiplying this equation by the denominators of $a_i^2$, we can suppose that $a_i \in \mathbb{F}_2[x,y]$, but then we observe that $a_3^2y$ has odd degree in $y$, whereas the other terms have even degree in $y$. This implies that $a_3=0$, so that we are left with $$ a_1^2+a_2^2x=0 $$ but again the term $a_2^2x$ has odd degree in $x$ and the other one has even degree, so that we are left with $a_1=a_2=0$. This proves that if $\beta^2 \in F$ then $\beta\in F$.

Now, suppose that $\beta^4 \in F$, then from what we have proves above it must be that $\beta^2\in F$, so that again $\beta\in F$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I will post an answer that gives the version in every positive characteristic (recovering the above for $p=2$). $\endgroup$
    – grghxy
    May 10 '15 at 23:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.