In which kinds of rings $R$ does the following hold:

$$(a)\cdot (b) = (ab) \; ?$$

With $a, b\in R$, $(a)$ denoting the (two-sided) ideal generated by $a$ and the multiplication of ideals $I, J\subset R$ defined as $$ I\cdot J = \biggl\{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i : n\in\mathbb{N}, x_i \in I, y_i \in J \biggr\}\, .$$

It seems to me that it only holds for commutative rings with $1$. Is that right?

Ok, I'm trying a proof:

Let $R$ be commutative with $1\in R$. Then $(a)\cdot (b) = (a b)$ for any $a, b\in R$.

First let $I_a := \{ra : r\in R\}$, we're going to show that $$(a) = I_a\, .$$ $I_a$ is obviously an ideal. Since $1 \in R$ we have $1 \cdot a \in I_a$, so $(a) \subset I_a$. On the other hand, any $x \in I_a$ can be written as $x = ra$ and so must be an element of $(a)$. This proves that $(a) = I_a$.

Then $$(a)\cdot (b) = I_a \cdot I_b = \biggl\{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i : n\in\mathbb{N}, x_i \in I_a, y_i \in I_b \biggr\} = \biggl\{\sum_{i=1}^n (r_i a) (s_i b) : n\in\mathbb{N}, r_i, s_i \in R \biggr\} = \biggl\{a b \sum_{i=1}^n r_i s_i : n\in\mathbb{N}, r_i, s_i \in R \biggr\} = \biggl\{a b r : r \in R \biggr\} = I_{ab} = (ab)\, .$$

We obviously had to use that $R$ is commutative. In the last step we also used that every $r \in R$ can be written as $r=\sum_{i=1}^n r_i s_i$. This is because $1 \in R$, so with $n=1$ we have $r = 1\cdot r$.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Where do you need the existence of $1$, exactly? $\endgroup$ – user228113 May 5 '15 at 7:54
  • $\begingroup$ @G.Sassatelli: Give me a proof where I don't have to use that $1\in R$. $\endgroup$ – Qyburn May 5 '15 at 8:35
  • $\begingroup$ I shall do it right away in the answers. Or someone else will. $\endgroup$ – user228113 May 5 '15 at 8:40
  • $\begingroup$ Well, it comes down to a notation war, after all. $\endgroup$ – user228113 May 5 '15 at 9:43
  • $\begingroup$ @G.Sassatelli: Honestly, I don't care so much. If it also works in rings without unity, nice, but that's not important for me. All rings which I work with have a $1$. $\endgroup$ – Qyburn May 5 '15 at 10:01

Take $R:=M_2(\mathbb{R})$.

$$a=b:=\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix} $$

Then :

$$(ab)=(0)=\{0\} $$

However :

$$\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix} \in (a),(b) $$

And :

$$\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix}\neq 0$$

So $(a).(b)\neq(ab)$.

Here I used the fact that there are nilpotents of order $2$ in the non-commutative ring. I don't know if you can find an example for a non-commutative-ring with no nilpotent elements (seems harder to me...).

Now for $(a)(b)=(ab)$ in commutative rings.

I claim that this does not hold for commutative ring without unity. First a definition :

In a commutative ring $A$, for $a\in A$, I define $(a)$ to be the set $\{ba|b\in A\}$. It is an ideal of $A$. Note that this definition does not imply that $a\in (a)$ (it does if $A$ has a unity).

Take $A_0:=\mathbb{Z}[X,Y]$ and $A:=(X,Y)$ it is an ideal of $A$ and hence a ring (although it has not a unit, it is an additive group which is closed for the multiplication). From now on any ideal has to be taken as an ideal of the ring $A$ (and not $A_0$).

Then take $a:=X$ and $b:=Y$. I claim that $abX=X^2Y\in (ab)$ but :

$$X^2Y\notin (a)(b) $$

The proof is straightforward because any element of $(a)$ or $(b)$ is either null or has total degree $\geq 2$ hence a non null element of $(a)(b)$ has total degree $\geq 4$ but $X^2Y$ is of total degree $3$.

So I would conclude by saying that both commutativity and unity are essential to this result. However I am still trying to find a non-commutative ring in which $ab=0$ implies $a=0$ or $b=0$ with a unit for which the relation does not hold... Let's see if this works :

$$A:=\mathbb{C}<X,Y> $$

It is the ring of "polynomials" over $\mathbb{C}$ for which $XY\neq YX$ (it exists...). I claim that this is a ring with a unity (it contains $\mathbb{C}$) and furthermore if $ab=0$ then $a=0$ or $b=0$ for this ring. However if :

$$a:=X^2\text{and } b:=Y^2 $$

Then $X^2Y\in (a)$, $XY^2\in (b)$ but :

$$X^2YXY^2\notin (X^2Y^2) $$

So the relation does not hold for "non-commutative domain" even with unity.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ So does $(a)\cdot (b) = (a b)$ hold for commutative rings with 1 in your opinion? $\endgroup$ – Qyburn May 5 '15 at 8:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Qyburn Your proof is good to me, I am wondering about the utility of the unity but I still cannot figure out a proof without it... If I do I edit my answer. $\endgroup$ – Clément Guérin May 5 '15 at 8:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Qyburn I think you are right about the unity see if the counter-example in my edited answer suits you... $\endgroup$ – Clément Guérin May 5 '15 at 8:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, but... Isn't $X^2\in (X),\ Y\in(Y)$, whence $X^2Y\in(X)\cdot(Y)$ by definition? Or am I missing something? $\endgroup$ – user228113 May 5 '15 at 9:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @G.Sassatelli, I agree with you, our definitions are different and this is exactly why we disagree. However I stick with my definition of an ideal generated by an element which makes more sens (to me). I admit that Wikipedia states your definition. By the way, maybe this is a good question to ask on this site what is an ideal generated by something in general ? $\endgroup$ – Clément Guérin May 5 '15 at 9:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.