5
$\begingroup$

$-\ln(1-(\frac{1}{x})) < \frac{100}{x} $ for $ x > 1$ is what I want to prove. I pulled a negative sign out and I got $\ln(\frac{x}{(x-1)}) < \frac{100}{x} $ for $ x > 1$. How do I continue with this proof? Or is it actually possible to prove this

Edit : I want this proof Algebrically, Calculus is allowed

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Nope, let's take $x=\frac{1}{1-e^{-100}}>1 , -\ln(1-\frac{1}{x})=100$, while $100/x<100$ since $x>1$ $\endgroup$ – Alexey Burdin May 2 '15 at 5:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't think you can get the algebraic proof . Not by applying derivative methods at least. $\endgroup$ – GrandAlpha May 2 '15 at 5:22
  • $\begingroup$ I have to some point, But I don't know how to do the rest... I'll update it in question $\endgroup$ – CuriousSciDude May 2 '15 at 5:26
  • $\begingroup$ Can we use calculus? $\endgroup$ – Mann May 2 '15 at 5:27
  • $\begingroup$ @Mann I guess not. $\endgroup$ – SalmonKiller May 2 '15 at 5:28
2
$\begingroup$

It is not true for $x=1+e^{-100}$. We then have $$ \log\frac{x}{x-1} = \log(x)+100 > 100 $$ but $$ \frac{100}{x} < 100 $$ because $x>1$.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I want proof of my expression lol I don't want where is it invalid :( $\endgroup$ – CuriousSciDude May 2 '15 at 6:00
  • $\begingroup$ @CuriousSciDude: Because your inequality is not true, there can be no proof of it. $\endgroup$ – Henning Makholm May 2 '15 at 6:01
  • $\begingroup$ Oh.. But wolfram says it true , so I thought it was true $\endgroup$ – CuriousSciDude May 2 '15 at 6:02
  • $\begingroup$ @CuriousSciDude: It is true for $x>1+\varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon$ is so small (but larger than $e^{-100}$) that Wolfram Alpha cannot distinguish numerically between $1$ and $1+\varepsilon$. $\endgroup$ – Henning Makholm May 2 '15 at 6:08
  • $\begingroup$ Btw where is this log x+ 100 from? $\endgroup$ – CuriousSciDude May 2 '15 at 14:39
2
$\begingroup$

As you almost wrote, making $x=\frac 1y$, the problem is to show that, for $y<1$, $$f(y)=100 y+\log(1-y)>0$$ (the function being undefined at $y=1$). We have $$f'(y)=100-\frac{1}{1-y}$$ which is positive as long as $y<\frac{99}{100}$ and negative for $y>\frac{99}{100}$. On the other hand $$f''(y)=-\frac{1}{(1-y)^2}$$ is always negative. So $f(y)$ increases up to a maximum value equal to $99-\log (100) >0$ and starts decreasing very fast and it exists a value of $y$ slightly below $1$ which makes $f(y)=1$ and negative for larger values. When $y=1-\epsilon$ , $f(y)= 100-100\epsilon+\log(\epsilon)$

So, as Henning Makholm answered, this is not true for all $x>1$.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ hey wat about for x greater then equal to 2 $\endgroup$ – CuriousSciDude May 2 '15 at 14:54
1
$\begingroup$

$ln \left(\frac{x}{x-1}\right)<\frac{100}{x}$

$-ln \left(\frac{x-1}{x}\right)<\frac{100}{x}$

$-ln \left(1-\frac{1}{x}\right)<\frac{100}{x}$

$ln \left(1-\frac{1}{x}\right)^x>-100$

$\left(1-\frac{1}{x}\right)^x>e^{-100}$

$\left(1-\frac{1}{x}\right)^x>\frac{1}{e^{100}}$

I think that $\frac{1}{e^{100}}$ is almost 0 and LHS is ofcourse $>0$ for all $x>1$

So this seems pretty reasonable.

Edit: It suddenly seems not strictly valid for all $x>1$ , but not sure. Edit:2 This is not true for only

$x\in(1,root\;of\;(x-1)-\frac{x}{e^{100/x}}=0)$

Since, the root lies very close to $1$ , it is approximately valid. And I think, this is good enough for algebraic solution.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you check the above answEr? $\endgroup$ – CuriousSciDude May 2 '15 at 6:25
  • $\begingroup$ Define g(x)=$ln(\frac{x}{x-1})-\frac{100}{x}$ , you can see that function decreases in $(1,\frac{100}{99})$ Also the function has only root at x approximately 1 , after that it remains negative. Hence, it is positive before the root of the equation. $\endgroup$ – Mann May 2 '15 at 6:33
1
$\begingroup$

Solution to \begin{align} \ln\left(\frac{x}{x-1}\right) = \frac{100}{x} \end{align} in terms of Lambert W function is \begin{align} x&=\frac{100}{W(-100\exp(-100))+100} \\ &\approx 1.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000037200759760 \end{align}

Btw, WolframAlpha gives the answer to the inequality as

Solution over the reals enter image description here

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Required to prove $ln \left(\frac{x}{x-1}\right)<\frac{100}{x}$

ie to prove $f(x) = {{100} \over x} - ln\left( {{x \over {x - 1}}} \right)>0$

${d \over {dx}}\left({{100} \over x} - ln\left( {{x \over {x - 1}}} \right)\right) = $

=......

=${{ - 101x - 100} \over {\mathop x\nolimits^2 (x + 1)}}$

$f'(x)$ is negative for all $x > 1$

Meaning always decreasing.

Easy to show $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f(x) = 0$

So The function is always decreasing towards 0

implies $f(x) > 0$ for $x > 1$

Implies $ln \left(\frac{x}{x-1}\right)<\frac{100}{x}$

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.