Assume the statement is not true and let $M$ be a maximum matching, $v$ an unmatched vertex of $A$.
Note that the requirement that $G$ is $C_4$-free means, that two vertices cannot have 2 common neighbours.
Let $t=\lceil{\frac32x}\rceil$.
$v$ has at least $t$ neighbours in $B$ that are all matched by $M$, call them $b_1,\ldots,b_t$
and let $a_1,\ldots,a_t$ be the vertices of $A$ such that $a_ib_i$ is an edge of $M$.
Each of the $a_i$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours in $B$ that must be different from all $b_i$
and each of them must be matched by $M$ (why?).
So $a_1$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, call this set $A_1$.
$a_2$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, and it can only have one neighbour in common
with $a_1$, so there is a set $A_2$ of size at least $t-2$ this is disjoint from both the $b_i$ and $A_1$.
Continuing this way (make a nice induction argument if you like), we find
$t+(t-1)+\ldots+1$ different elements of $B$, all matched by $M$, so $A$ also must have at least
this number of elements.
Since $t+(t-1)+\ldots+1=\frac{t(t+1)}2\geq\frac{\frac94x^2}2>x^2$ we found a contradiction.