3
$\begingroup$

I know that a rational number can always be expressed as a fraction, but can't we also say that it is a number that follows a definite pattern? Like one-third for example; it is never ending as a decimal, but it is predictable. This is observed in most if not all rational numbers, as far as I know.

So would it be possible for a number to be partially predictable?

Could a number have the exact same digits as pi, but instead have a periodic, predictable digit in it?

Is there a category of Rational irrational numbers (or irrational rational numbers)? For instance, could a number with digits like pi or the square root of 2 have rational parts?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, all rational numbers eventually have a repeating pattern when represented in decimal (or any integer base.) (Numbers that terminate, like $1/5$ can be thought of as having repeating $0$ digits.) $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Apr 30 '15 at 12:41
  • $\begingroup$ $\pi$ has predictable digits - you just compute $\pi$ to enough digits to predict it. The notion of what is "predictable" is a vague notion. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Apr 30 '15 at 12:42
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure this makes any sense. What precisely does it mean to have the "exact same digits as $\pi$, but instead have a periodic, predictable digit in it"? What does it mean for an irrational number to have "rational parts"? $\endgroup$ – Travis Apr 30 '15 at 12:44
  • $\begingroup$ I think he's asking if there is a class of irrational numbers where particular digits in the decimal expansion appears predictably and patterned. Like for example, $$0.19528872964211126372...$$ where a 2 appears predictably every fourth decimal term... The first three decimal terms are random (or if not random, just unpatterned) $\endgroup$ – Eleven-Eleven Apr 30 '15 at 12:50
  • $\begingroup$ @tennispro1213, it would be helpful, though, if you chimed in here and helped clarify what you are looking for. $\endgroup$ – Eleven-Eleven Apr 30 '15 at 12:54
3
$\begingroup$

It is possible for an irrational number to have a predictable pattern; consider $0.1101001000100001...$. It is also possible to have an irrational number that is another irrational number away from a rational; i.e. $x-y = r $, where $x,y$ irrational and $r $ rational; in fact the equivalence classes of such numbers are dense in the reals. So you can subtract some irrational number from $\pi $ and get a number with a repeating pattern... in fact any pattern that you want.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Does this also mean that one could work backwards, too? Like if one starts with a number with a repeating pattern, would one be able to add and subtract numbers from it till pi or any other number is "created"? $\endgroup$ – tkhanna42 Apr 30 '15 at 15:02
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you can construct pi using, for example, a continued fraction. Not through addition and subtraction only, however; division is necessary. In any case, you need to clarify what you mean by "pattern". As I mentioned, we can concoct any number of patterns. That something is a pattern doesn't make it profound or interesting. $\endgroup$ – Emily Apr 30 '15 at 15:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By pattern I mean a recognizable recurrence of digits or a relationship between them. In pi, the digits start off as 3,1,4,1,5,9....there isn't much that we can predict using a simple expression. But for a number with the digits 3,1,2,4,1,2,5,9,2,.....We see that there is a simple pattern of repeating twos. I understand that everything may seem to have a pattern if we analyze it macroscopically, but I would like to first verify that it holds true for basic patterns and then extend it to more complex patterns. $\endgroup$ – tkhanna42 Apr 30 '15 at 15:21
0
$\begingroup$

A rational number is one that is the ratio of two integers. Rational numbers will have a predictable pattern in their decimal representations but that is not the definition of a rational number. As others have said, this pattern is that, eventually,a block of digits will start to repeat. In a very simple case, e.g. $1/3$ this will just be the single digit $3$ repeating. Slightly more complex is $1/7000 = 0.000 142857 142857 ...$ which has three $0$s followed by repeating blocks of $142857$. As others have said, this includes the terminating case by considering the repeating block to be $0$.

All sorts of other predictable and interesting patterns are possible but they will not be rational numbers. Read about Liouville numbers. These have a very predictable pattern to their digits but they are not rational, in fact they were the first known transcendental numbers.

So, no - you cannot say that a rational is one whose digits have a pattern. It is only rational if the digits follow the quite precise pattern of ending with a repeating block of digits.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.