1
$\begingroup$

Prove that if $(a_n)$ converges and $|a_n - nb_n| < 2$ for all $n \in \mathbb N^+$ then $(b_n)$ converges.

Is the following proof valid?

Proof
Since $(a_n)$ converges, $(a_n)$ must be bounded, i.e. $\exists M \in \mathbb R^+$ such that for each $n \in \mathbb N^+$, we have $|a_n| < M$.
Now, by the triangle inequality, $|nb_n|$ = $|nb_n - a_n + a_n| \le |nb_n - a_n| + |a_n| < 2 + M$.
Hence, $|b_n - 0| < \frac{2 + M}{n}$.
Let $\epsilon > 0$ be given, and by the Archimedean Property of $\mathbb R$, we can choose $K \in \mathbb N^+$ such that $K > \frac {2+M}{\epsilon}$.
Then, $n \ge K \implies n > \frac {2 + M}{\epsilon} \implies |b_n - 0| < \epsilon$.
Therefore $(b_n)$ converges, and its limit is $0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. It is correct $\endgroup$ – HK Lee Apr 20 '15 at 4:35
1
$\begingroup$

Your proof is correct. In fact, once you have $$|b_n|<\frac{M+2}{n}$$ it is clear that since the numerator is bounded one can make the right hand side $<\epsilon$ for arbitrarily small $\epsilon >0.$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.