2
$\begingroup$

$\int\limits_{\gamma} \frac{1}{z-1}$

$\gamma = \{z : \lvert z \rvert = 1\}$

I use Cauchy's integral formula, which says $$\int\limits_{\gamma} \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{n+1}} = \frac{2\pi i}{n!} f^{(n)}(a)$$ and I choose $f(z) = 1$ to be my holomorphic function.

$n = 0$ and $a = 1$ (which doesn't matter since my $f(z)$ is a constant function), so evaluating Cauchy's integral formula, $$\int\limits_{\gamma} \frac{1}{z-1} = 2\pi i.$$

Why is this not the correct solution?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The path $\gamma$ in Cauchy's formula should surround $a$. Not pass through it as in your case. $\endgroup$ – GEdgar Apr 17 '15 at 1:42
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ There is a rather surly singularity at $z=1$; your curve passes right through that. All bets are off. $\endgroup$ – ncmathsadist Apr 17 '15 at 1:44
2
$\begingroup$

If there is a pole on the contour, the integral doesn't converge. If it is a simple pole, you can find the Cauchy principal value (basically, if the integrand has a singularity at $c \in [a,b]$, the CPV is $$ \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0} \int_a^{c-\varepsilon}+\int_{c+\varepsilon}^b) $$ by taking half the residue at $c$, which you prove by deforming the contour, adding a small semicircle around $c$.

For any other sort of pole, the situation can't be tackled in general.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is my situation considered a simple pole? $\endgroup$ – mr eyeglasses Apr 17 '15 at 2:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A simple pole is just one where the most singular term is $(z-a)^{-1}$, so yes. $\endgroup$ – Chappers Apr 17 '15 at 2:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.