0
$\begingroup$

I need some help to solve the following problem that appears on page 31 of the book of William Fulton entitled Algebraic Curves.

Exercise :

Let $ V = \mathbb{A}^1 $, $ \Gamma (V) = k[X] $, $ K = k(V) = k(X) $.

1) For each $ a \in k = V $, show that $ \mathcal{O}_a ( V ) $ is a discrete valuation ring with uniformizing parameter $ t = X-a $.

2) Show that $ \mathcal{O}_{\infty} = \{ \ \dfrac{F}{G} \in k(X) \mid \mathrm{deg} ( G ) \geq \mathrm{deg} (F) \ \} $ is also a discrete valuation ring, with uniformizing parameter $ t = \dfrac{1}{X} $.

Thanks in advance for your help.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ok. So perhaps it is given $\;k\;$ is an algebraically closed field? $\endgroup$ – Timbuc Apr 5 '15 at 15:17
0
$\begingroup$

1) The discrete valuation at $a\in k$ of $\frac {c_r(X-a)^r+\dots+c_n (X-a)^n}{b_s(X-a)^s+\dots+b_m(X-a)^m} \; (r\leq n, s\leq m; c_r,b_s\neq 0)$ is $r-s$.
In particular $v_a(X-a)=1$.

2) The discrete valuation at $\infty$ of $\frac {c_0 +\dots+c_n X^n}{b_0+\dots+b_mX^m} \; (c_n,b_m\neq 0)$ is $m-n$.
In particular $v_\infty(\frac 1X)=1$.

Remark
Algebraic closedness of $k$ is irrelevant in the above.
However if $k$ is not algebraically closed there are more discrete valuations than those I have described, namely the $v_{p(X)}$ corresponding to monic irreducible polynomials $p(X)\in k[X]$ of degree $\gt1$.
Those new valuations are described by a formula similar to that in 1), which corresponds to the case $p(X)=X-a$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In my book. We need to show that there is an irreducible element $ t \in R $ such that every non zero : $ z \in R $ may bee written uniquely in the form $ z = ut^n $ and $u$ a unit in $R$, and $n$ a nonnegative integer. How to show that ? $\endgroup$ – Bryan261 Apr 5 '15 at 17:00
  • $\begingroup$ In 1) $t$ is $X-a$ and in 2) $t$ is $\frac 1X$. Since $n$ is the valuation (respectively $r-s$ and $m-n$) you should be able to extract $u$ from the very explicit formula in the answer. Or just write brutally $u=\frac {z}{t^n}$ since you know $z,t$ and $n$ ...Also: beware that there is a clash in notation between your $n$ and my $n$ :-) $\endgroup$ – Georges Elencwajg Apr 5 '15 at 17:13
  • $\begingroup$ You are welcome, Bryan. $\endgroup$ – Georges Elencwajg Apr 5 '15 at 17:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.