By "$E$ is countably compact", I mean that every countable open cover of $E$ has a finite subcover. By "$E$ is compact", I mean that every open cover of $E$ has a finite subcover. Let $M$ be a metric space. Prove that if a subset $E$ of $M$ is countably compact, then it is compact.

I am looking for a proof that just uses the machinery of metric space topology, and doesn't appeal to general topological spaces, if this is possible.


This is tied in to a standard set of compactness results for metric spaces. Here the usual sequence of equivalent properties is as follows:

  • Countable compactness
  • Limit point compactness (every infinite set has a limit point)
  • Sequential compactness (every sequence has a convergent subsequence)
  • Compactness

These are all equivalent for metric spaces. I'm afraid I don't know off the top of my head a more direct proof than proving the chain of implications one at a time. I checked in Munkres, which proves that the latter three are equivalent (which should be in any standard text), and the only thing remaining to show is the implication (countable compactness) $\implies$ (limit point compactness), which uses the following modified argument.

You must prove that every set $A$ without limit points is finite. We can assume that $A$ is countable without loss of generality (If every countably infinite set has a limit point, then all infinite sets have limit points). Now for each element $a\in A$, there is a neighborhood $U_a$ of $a$ containing no other points of $A$ (since $a$ is not a limit point of $A$). Since $A$ contains all of its limit points tautologically, $A$ must be closed, which in turn implies that $A$ is countably compact. Therefore the cover $\{U_a\}$ has a finite subcover, implying that $A$ is finite.

  • $\begingroup$ It’s no more direct, but one can bypass sequential compactness: limit point compact implies totally bounded, which implies separable, which implies second countable, which implies Lindelöf. $\endgroup$ Apr 4 '15 at 14:50
  • $\begingroup$ Your proof seems good, except it doesn't make sense to show that $A$ is closed, therefore countably compact, when countable compactness is already assumed. However, I was looking for some intuition as to why countable compactness implies compactness, and this intuition is kind of obscured through the chain of implications: Countable Compactness $\Rightarrow$ Limit Point Compactness $\Rightarrow$ Sequential Compactness $\Rightarrow$ Compactness. Is there any way of doing this more directly, or at least explaining an intuition for it? $\endgroup$ Apr 4 '15 at 16:58
  • $\begingroup$ We need to show that our set $A \subset E$ is countably compact assuming that $E$ is countably compact. As to the intuition, I would also be interested in seeing something less formal. $\endgroup$
    – Rolf Hoyer
    Apr 4 '15 at 17:53
  • $\begingroup$ It is not always true that $A$ contains all of it's limit points. Consider a sequence in $E=[0,1]$. Then $A$, the sequence itself, is infinite but doesn't have a limit point. $\endgroup$
    – abcdef
    Apr 4 '15 at 22:01
  • $\begingroup$ In the argument we were assuming that $A$ was a set without any limit points. $\endgroup$
    – Rolf Hoyer
    Apr 4 '15 at 22:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.