4
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

As seen on the above picture, if you have two triangles that are mirror reflections of each other (or symmetrical about the y-axis), are they considered congruent, assuming that they are neither equilateral nor isosceles?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ two triangles are congruent if they have same side lengths. orientation doesn't matter $\endgroup$ – AgentS Apr 4 '15 at 7:32
  • $\begingroup$ Yes they are because mirror reflection are just the same triangle reversed $\endgroup$ – user210387 Apr 4 '15 at 7:33
2
$\begingroup$

The common notion is that two triangles are congruent precisely when there exists an isometry of the plane mapping one triangle onto the other. Reflections are isometries (i.e., bijective distance preserving functions), so most certainly the two triangles above are congruent.

It is perfectly sensible to consider shapes to be congruent only if one can be mapped onto another by an orientation preserving isometry. In fact, one can start with any group of transformations of the plane and define the corresponding notion of 'congruent' shapes, with respect to the chosen group. It is up to you which group you choose. The common notion of congruence in the plane is for the group of all isometries. It is not trivial but not very hard to characterise the isometries of the plane. It then becomes a theorem (not a definition as some high school texts will teach you) that two triangles are congruent iff they have the same side lengths (or any one of another such characterisation).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.