WolframAlpha says $$ \lim_{x\to 0}\biggl(\lim_{y\to 0} x\sin\frac{1}{y}\biggl) $$ does not exists.

But I think when $y\to0$, $x\sin\frac{1}{y}$ tends to $\{-x,x\}$, so when $x\to0$ the limit is $\{0,0\}$

So what exactly the limit is? Does it exist?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Are you aware that $\lim_{y\to 0}\lim_{x\to 0}$ is not the same as $\lim_{(x,y)\to (0,0)}$? Moreover, note that $\lim_{y\to 0 }\sin(1/y)$ does not exists. $\endgroup$ – Surb Apr 1 '15 at 15:02

The "iterated" limit $$ \lim_{x\to 0} \lim_{y\to 0} x\sin \Bigl(\frac{1}{y}\Bigr)$$ does not exists, because it does not exist the inner limit.

EDIT: my first treatment of the limit for $(x,y)\to (0,0)$ was not correct. I think that now all works well.

We have to be careful about the following limit in $\mathbb{R}^2$ $$\lim_{(x,y)\to (0,0)} x\sin \Bigl(\frac{1}{y}\Bigr)$$ Call for simplicity $f(x,y) = x\sin \Bigl( \frac{1}{y}\Bigr)$.

The point $(0,0)$ is an accumulation point for pairs of the form $(x,0)$ where the inner function is not defined. It turns out that the limit does not exist, because the sequence $(\frac{1}{n},0)$ converges to $(0,0)$ as $n$ approaches $+\infty$, but $f(\frac{1}{n},0)$ does not converge to any value (since $f$ is not defined at every point of the sequence); while at the same time, there are infinitely many sequences $(x_n,y_n)$ converging to $(0,0)$ such that $f(x_n,y_n)$ converges to $0$.

However, it is meaningful to consider the limit $$\lim_{\substack{(x,y)\to (0,0) \\ y \neq 0}} x\sin \Bigl(\frac{1}{y}\Bigr)$$ We are simply restricting ourselves to the domain of $f$. In this region, which is $D = \mathbb{R}^2 \setminus \{y=0\}$, the inner function is everywhere defined and we can argue in a simple way: the sine is bounded everywhere and the function $x$ is infinitesimal as $(x,y)\to (0,0)$. Since this estimate holds in the whole $D$, we conclude that the above limit exists and is equal to $0$.

  • $\begingroup$ I think $$\lim_{(x,y)\to (0,0)} x\sin \Bigl(\frac{1}{y}\Bigr)$$ exists and equals to 0.You can varify in the wolframalpha $\endgroup$ – partida Apr 1 '15 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ @user15961, did you check all trajectories? $\endgroup$ – jameselmore Apr 1 '15 at 15:42
  • $\begingroup$ @jameselmore sin(1/y) have boundry,however x is an Infinitesimal. Infinitesimal times boundry value is Infinitesimal,isn't it? $\endgroup$ – partida Apr 1 '15 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ @user15961, if we approach this limit along the trajectory $(x,y) = \lim_{t\to 0} (t,0)$, then this limit is undefined. Because of this we can't claim (in general) that the $\lim_{(x,y)\to (0,0)}$ is defined $\endgroup$ – jameselmore Apr 1 '15 at 15:54

We've been asked to consider $\lim_{x \to 0}\big(\lim_{y\to 0} x\cdot\sin(\frac1y)\big)$. Which is undefined due to the 'iterative' nature of it's definition. In response, people have made several claims which have considered the same limit under arbitrary trajectories $(x,y) \to (0,0)$. Let's look at this a little closer. If we consider $r,\theta$ such that $x=r\cos(\theta), y = r\sin(\theta)$

$$L = \lim_{(x,y)\to (0,0)}x\cdot\sin(\frac1y) = \lim_{r\to0} r\cos(\theta)\cdot \sin(\frac{1}{r\sin(\theta)})$$ If we assume for the moment that $\sin(\theta) \neq 0$, then $$0 = \lim_{r\to 0} -r|\cos(\theta)|\leq L \leq \lim_{r\to 0} r|\cos(\theta)| = 0$$ So it appears that $$L = 0 \ \forall\theta\neq n \pi, n\in\mathbb{N},\text{but }L\text{ DNE, elsewhere.}$$

Because of this, under certain trajectories this limit can tend to $0$ but since it is not $0$ under all trajectories (and we have only looked at constant vector trajectories), we cannot conclude that this limit exists.


If I understand correctly, with writing:


you asked Wolfram Alpha to calculate first the limit $$\lim_{y\rightarrow 0}$$ In this way you are considering x as a parameter. For this Wolfram Alpha says that the limit does not exist!


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.