Given a function $z=f(x,y)$ the tangent plane at $(a,b,f(a,b))$ has equation $$0=z-f(a,b)-f_x(a,b)(x-a)-f_y(a,b)(y-b)$$It's clear, just by subbing in $(a,b)$ into this equation that the limit of $z=f(x,y)$ as $(x,y)\to(a,b)$ is equal to $f(a,b)$. That is, locally this plane looks like the function. My question is, why is this the best approximation. For example, $$0=z-f(a,b)-P(x-a)-Q(y-b)$$where $P,Q\not=0$ is also a plane containing $(a,b,f(a,b))$ which gets closer to $f(x,y)$ as $(x,y)$ approaches $(a,b)$. I can see via picture why the tangent plane is the best, but how would I show it mathematically. I guess by best I mean the following: For any $\varepsilon>0$ then exists $\delta>0$ such that


implies that


Is it true that given the $\varepsilon>0$ the $\delta$ used in the tangent plane approximation is bigger than the one used for any other plane? Does this mean "better" approximation? How would I prove this?


1 Answer 1


You can explain it with asymptoic analysis: the equation of the tangent plane is the only linear approximation $L(x-a,y-b)$ such that the error in approximating: $\,f(x,y)-L(x-a,y-b)\,$ is $\,o\bigl(\lVert(x-a,y-b)\rVert\bigr)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.