With $\alpha > 0,\, \beta \in \Bbb R^*,\, \alpha, \beta \neq 1$ and $f : \Bbb R \to \Bbb R_+^*$, let's consider the functional equation $$ f(\alpha x) = f(x)^{\beta} \tag{$\Xi$}$$ or equivalently $g(\alpha x) = \beta g(x)$ for $g = \ln f$.

The case where $\alpha = \sqrt2$, $\beta = 2$ and $f \in \mathcal C^2$ has already been solved here : Solving $(f(x))^2 = f(\sqrt{2}x)$ (the answer is $\exists \lambda\mid f(x) = e^{\lambda x^2}$).

What if we relax/change some of the constraints, for instance:

  • Keeping $f$ regular (say $\mathcal C^{\infty}$) but setting $\alpha, \beta$ generic
  • $f \in \mathcal C^0$
  • $f \in L^1$
  • (other ideas?)
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sur how this can help but note that a function satisfying $h(\lambda x)=\lambda^ph(x)$ for every $\lambda>0$ is said to be homogeneous of degree $p$. $\endgroup$ – Surb Mar 25 '15 at 12:55

Summary at the bottom.

$$g(\alpha x)=\beta g(x)$$

$$\gamma = \frac{\ln |\beta|}{\ln\alpha}$$

If $\beta >0$, $\beta=\alpha^\gamma$ and $g(\alpha x)=\alpha ^\gamma g(x)$.

We define $h(x)$, for $x\neq 0$, as $h(x)= g(x)x^{-\gamma} $. Then: $$h(\alpha x)=g(\alpha x){\alpha^{-\gamma} x^{-\gamma}}=g(x){x^{-\gamma}}=h(x) $$

Now let $k_1(x)=h(\alpha^x)$ and $k_2(x)=h(-\alpha^x)$.

Then $k_1$ and $k_2$ can be any periodic functions, with a period of $1$.


$$ g(x)=\cases{x^\gamma k_1(\log_\alpha(x)) & if $x>0$ \cr x^\gamma k_2(\log_\alpha(-x)) & if $x<0$ } $$

If $\beta<0$, $\beta=-\alpha^\gamma$. We use the same definition for $h$, $k_1$ and $k_2$, but now we have: $k_1(x+1)=-k_1(x)$ and $k_2(x+1)=-k_2(x)$.

So $k_1$ and $k_2$ can be any antiperiodic functions, with a period of $1$.


$$g(x)=\cases{x^\gamma k_1(\log_\alpha(x)) & if $x>0$ \cr x^\gamma k_2(\log_\alpha(-x)) & if $x<0$ }$$

If $g \in \mathcal C^n$, then $k_1$, $k_2 \in \mathcal C^n$.

If $n\geq\gamma$, then in a neighborhood of $0^+$: $$g(x)=\sum\limits_{k=0}^{n}\frac{g^{(k)}(0)}{k!}x^k + o(x^n)= x^\gamma k_1(\log_\alpha(x))$$ $$k_1(\log_\alpha(x))=\sum\limits_{k=0}^{n}\frac{g^{(k)}(0)}{k!}x^{k-\gamma} + o(x^{n-\gamma})$$

So $k_1(\log_\alpha(x))$ has a limit at $0^+$ (which could be infinite), so $k_1$ has a limit at $-\infty$. So it must be a constant (since it is periodic of period at most $2$). We can use the same reasoning for $k_2$. So $g(x)=\cases{c_1x^\gamma & \text{if } x>0 \cr c_2x^\gamma & \text{if } x<0 } $

Therefore, all the derivatives of $g$ at $0$ of order smaller than $\gamma$ are $0$, and if $n>\gamma$, then $g$ is not $p=\lceil \gamma\rceil$ times differentiable near $0$. So $\gamma = n$ and $c_1=c_2$.

To sum it up:

In general:

$$g(x)=\cases{x^\gamma k_1(\log_\alpha(x)) & if $x>0$ \cr x^\gamma k_2(\log_\alpha(-x)) & if $x<0$ } $$

Where $k_1$ and $k_2$ are two periodic (if $\beta>0$) or antiperiodic (if $\beta<0$) functions, of period $1$.

If $g\in\mathcal C^{n}$, so are $k_1$ and $k_2$. And if $n\geq\gamma$, $n = \gamma$, and $g(x)=\lambda x^n$.

If there are any mistakes, please let me know.

  • $\begingroup$ Very nice, much better approach than mine. Comment #1 : if $\beta \in (0,1)$ and $\alpha > 1$, $\gamma < 0$ and if $g$ is continuous in $0$, that implies $k_1 = k_2 = g = 0$ (see my answer). $\endgroup$ – Alexandre Halm Apr 2 '15 at 6:24

Assume $f$ (and $g$) is $\mathcal C^{\infty}$ (we will see that $\mathcal C^p$ with $p$ large enough is sufficient to get the same result).

Derivating the equality $g(\alpha x) = \beta g(x)$ $k$ times gives $\alpha^k g^{(k)}(\alpha x) = \beta g^{(k)}(x)$.

Let's assume first that $\alpha, \beta > 1$. Replacing $x$ by $(x/\alpha)$ $n$ times in the last equality yields

$$g^{(k)}(x) = \frac{\beta}{\alpha^k}g^{(k)}\left(\frac x{\alpha}\right) = \ldots = \left(\frac{\beta}{\alpha^k}\right)^n g^{(k)}\left(\frac x{\alpha^n}\right) \tag{$\phi$}$$

Now let's pick $k = \left\lceil \frac{\ln \beta}{\ln \alpha} \right\rceil$ so that $\left|\frac{\beta}{\alpha^k}\right| \le 1$ and $\frac{\beta}{\alpha^{k-1}} > 1$. Since $g^{(k)}$ is continuous in $0$, taking the limit in $(\phi)$ when $n \to \infty$ commands $g^{(k)}(x) = 0$ for all $x$. So $g$ must be a polynomial of degree $\le k$.

If we replace $k$ with $p \le k-1$ in $(\phi)$, the limit when $n \to \infty$ now commands $g^{(p)}(0) = 0$ since $\frac{\beta}{\alpha^{p}} \ge \frac{\beta}{\alpha^{k-1}} > 1$. That implies that $g(x)$ is of the form $g(x) = \lambda x^k$. But $g(\alpha x) = \lambda \alpha^k x^k= \beta g(x) = \beta \lambda x^k$ forces $\beta = \alpha^k$.

Now if we assume $\alpha, \beta < 1$, it is obvious that $(\Xi)$ is equivalent to $g(\tfrac1{\alpha}x) = \tfrac1{\beta}g(x)$ and since $\tfrac1{\alpha}, \tfrac1{\beta} >1$, we are back in the former case.

Wrap-up: if $\alpha, \beta>1$ or $\alpha, \beta<1$, noting $k = \frac{\ln \beta}{\ln \alpha}$, $(\Xi)$ only has $\mathcal C^{\lceil k \rceil}$ solutions if $k \in \Bbb N$ and in this case the solutions are of the form $f(x) = e^{\lambda x^k}$.

Let's now assume $\alpha >1$ and $0 < \beta <1$, with $f$ (and $g$) only $\mathcal C^0$ (continuous). Rewriting $(\Xi)$ as $g(x) = \beta g(\tfrac x{\alpha})$, we get by iterating $\forall n, g(x) = \beta^n g(\tfrac x{\alpha^n})$ and, by continuity of $g$ in $0$, $g(x) = 0$. As earlier, the case $\alpha < 1 $ and $\beta >1$ has the same solution.

Wrap-up 2: if $\alpha >1, 0<\beta<1$ or $\alpha <1, \beta>1$, the only $\mathcal C^0$ (even bounded) solution to $(\Xi)$ is $f = constant$.

(source: mit.edu)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.