Suppose we have smooth manifolds $M,M',N$, a smooth map $f\colon M\rightarrow M'$ and a smooth submanifold $S'\subseteq M'\times N$, such that the projection $\pi_{M'}\colon S'\rightarrow M'$ is a submersion.

A quick calculation shows, that the map $(f\times id)\colon M\times N\rightarrow M\times N'$ is transverse to $S'$, so $S\colon=(f\times id)^{-1}(S)\subseteq M\times N$ is a smooth submanifold.

Is the projection $\pi_M\colon S\rightarrow M$ always a submersion? If not, which are conditions on $f$, such that $\pi_M$ is a submersion?


The answer is yes, it is always a submersion. First of all, $\pi:=\pi_M$ is clearly surjective. Also, for any point $s'\in S'$ lying over some $p'\in M'$, the tangent space at $s'$ maps surjectively onto the tangent space at $p'$ (since $\pi':=\pi_{M'}$ is a submersion.) Take then a point $p\in M$ and a vector $v\in T_pM$, and push-it forward to $M$, $v'=f_*v$. From what we've just noted, there must be a point $s'\in S'$ which actually lies in the intersection $f(M)\times N \cap S$, and the tangent space at that point maps surjectively onto the tangent space at $f(p)$. In other words, there is a vector $w'\in T_{s'}S'$ such that $\pi'_*w=v'$, and this $w'$ is the image of some $w \in TS$. Now, it's obvious that this $\pi_*w=v$.

Here's a high-brow proof: $\pi$ is just the pullback of $\pi'$. The pull back of a submersion is a submersion.

EDIT: Here's some details about the above; I'll only sketch the details, since I think that it is a very useful exercise to convince yourself of these facts. First of all, the image of $f\times \mathrm{id}$ clearly is $f(M)\times N$. Also, by definition, $S'=(f\times \mathrm{id})^{-1}(S)$, so what is $f\times \mathrm{id}(S)$? You should convince yourself that it is precisely $f(M)\times N\cap S'$. Then, I claim $(f\times \mathrm{id})_*(TS)=T(f(M)\times N\cap S')$. This should be easy to see, because $f_*f^*T(f(M)\times N\cap S')=T(f(M)\times N\cap S')$.

Now, $s′$ was chosen to be in the intersection $f(M)\times N \cap S′$, and $v′$ is tangent to $M$, so that $w′$ is tangent to $f(M)\times N \cap S'$. Clearly, from the above, $w'$ is then the pushforward of some $w\in TS$. Now, I above incorrectly stated that $\pi_*w=v$. We're a priori not sure of this; what we know is that there is some $w$ that such equality holds (the problem here is $v$ might not be the only preimage of $v'$, so a randomly chosen $w$ might map to some other preimage; on the other hand, again $f\times \mathrm{id}$ pulls back a copy of $w'$ for every preimage of $v'$.)

(I sense this might sound a bit confusing, mostly because I'm being a bit lazy and not writing thing more explicitly. However, if you think of this whole thing as a pullback, the whole thing becomes clear, because I'm basically going through an "element proof" of my highbrow proof.)

Adition: check also:

The tangent space to the preimage of $Z$ is the preimage of the tangent space of $Z$.

  • $\begingroup$ Why is $w'$ the image of some $w\in TS$? $\endgroup$ – Tom Mar 25 '15 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ Because $s'$ was chosen to be in the intersection $M\times N\cap S'$ and $v'$ is tangent to $M$, so that $w'$ is tangent to $M\times N\cap S'$. $\endgroup$ – Artur Araujo Mar 25 '15 at 15:46
  • $\begingroup$ So far so good, but why is $w'$ the image of some $w\in TS$? The differential $d(f\times id)\colon TS\rightarrow TS'$ does not need to be surjective. Sorry if I don't get it. Could you maybe elaborate a little bit more? Thank you very much. $\endgroup$ – Tom Mar 25 '15 at 15:57
  • $\begingroup$ You're sure right! Sorry for mixing up! $\endgroup$ – Jesus RS Mar 25 '15 at 16:07
  • $\begingroup$ @ArturAraujo Do you know a reference for a proof that pullbacks of submersions are submersions or could you even provide one? $\endgroup$ – Tom Mar 25 '15 at 16:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.