I am having serious problems in deriving the coordinate component expression for Lie derivative of vector fields.

I already know how to do that using an outdated coordinate-based approach mostly used in old physics literature, and I also know I can do this in a more simple way by using a coordinate system adapted to my vector field, I want to get the correct form using the definition of the Lie derivative.

Some of this might be because of my low understanding of flows.

Let $M$ be a real, $n$-dimensional, $C^\infty$ manifold, let $X$ and $V$ be smooth vector fields defined in the neighborhood of a point $p\in M$, and let $ (U,x) $ be a chart so that $p\in U$ and $x(p)=(x^1(p),...,x^n(p))$.

Let be $V=V^\mu \partial/\partial x^\mu$ and $X=X^\mu\partial/\partial x^\mu$ in $U$.

Let $\Phi^X_t$ be the flow of $X$. If I understand this well, then $$ \frac{d}{dt}\Phi^X_t(p)=X(p). $$

The Lie-derivative should be $$ \left.\mathcal{L}_XV\right|_p=\frac{d}{dt}(\Phi^X_{-t})_*(\left.V\right|_{\Phi^X_t(p)}). $$

My attempt was as follows: $$ \mathcal{L}_XV|_p[f]=\frac{d}{dt}(V|_{\Phi^X_t(p)}[f\circ\Phi^X_{-t}])= \\ =\frac{d}{dt}(V|_{\Phi^X_t(p)}[f\circ x^{-1}\circ x\circ\Phi^X_{-t}]), $$ then, I try to evaluate the vector field on that massive composition by $$ \frac{d}{dt}(V^\mu(\Phi^X_t)\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\right|_{x(\Phi^X_t)}(f\circ x^{-1}\circ x\circ\Phi^X_{-t}))= \\ =\frac{d}{dt}(V^\mu(\Phi^X_t)\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\right|_{x(\Phi^X_{-t})}(f\circ x^{-1})\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\nu}(x\circ\Phi^X_{-t})), $$ and then what? I am not even sure that where I wrote $\partial/\partial x^\nu$, should I have written $d/dt$ instead? In either case, I have no idea how to go any further, and any help is greatly appreciated.

| cite | improve this question | | | | |

In the meantime, I managed to solve this, I am posting my solution here in case someone is struggling with the same thing.

Let $M$ be a real, $C^\infty$, $n$-dimensional manifold, let $X$ and $V$ be $C^\infty$ vector field defined in the neighborhood of some point $p$ and let $(U,x)$ be a chart with $p\in U$. The coordinate expression for $X$ and $V$ are $$ X_p=X^\mu(p)\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\right|_p\ \mathrm{and}\ V_p=V^\mu(p)\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\right|_p. $$ All vector fields from now on are evaluated at point $p$ with $p$ being reasonable arbitrary, so I will omit the $p$'s where it is beneficial.

One thing to note that the coordinate representation of the flow $\Phi^X_t(p)$, $x\circ\Phi^X_t\circ x^{-1}$ at $t=0$, and only at $t=0$ can be expressed as $$ x^\mu\circ\Phi^X_t\circ x^{-1}=x^\mu+tX^\mu, $$ since at $t=0$, this gives back the identity map, and its derivative at $t=0$ are the components of $X$.

Then, $$ \mathcal{L}_XV=\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{(\Phi^X_{-t})_*(V\circ\Phi^X_t)-V}{t}= \\ \ \\ =\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{(\Phi^X_{-t*})^\mu_{\ \ \nu}(V^\nu\circ\Phi^X_t)-V^\mu}{t}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}, $$ now I switch to using the above expression for the flow, since we'll be taking the limit at $t=0$, and also note that the matrix of the pushforward via $\Phi^X_{-t}$ at $(x+tX)$ (since we are moving from coordinates $x+tX$ to $x$) is $$ \left.\frac{\partial(x^\mu-tX^\mu)}{\partial x^\nu}\right|_{x+tX}=\delta^\mu_\nu-t\left.\frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial x^\nu}\right|_{x+tX}, $$ and so $$ \mathcal{L}_XV=\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{(\delta^\mu_\nu-t\left.\frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial x^\nu}\right|_{x+tX})V^\nu(x+tX)-V^\mu(x)}{t}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}= \\ \ \\ =\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\frac{V^\mu(x+tX)-V^\mu(x)-t\left.\frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial x^\nu}\right|_{x+tX}V^\nu(x+tX)}{t}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}= \\ \ \\=\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\left[\frac{V^\mu(x+tX)-V^\mu(x)}{t}-\left.\frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial x^\nu}\right|_{x+tX}V^\nu(x+tX)\right]\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}= \\ \ \\ \left(X^\nu\frac{\partial V^\mu}{\partial x^\nu}-V^\nu\frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial x^\nu}\right)\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}, $$ where everything in the last line is evaluated at $p$ or the coordinates of $p$.

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.