Let $f$ be a cusp form of weight $2$ on $\Gamma_0(N)$ and assume that $f$ is a Hecke form and a newform. Then, we easily see that $$C(\gamma)=2i\pi \int_{\tau}^{\gamma \tau}{f(\tau')d\tau'} \quad (\gamma \in \Gamma_0(N))$$ is independant of $\tau$ (assumed in $\mathcal{H}$) and defines a group morphism from $\Gamma_0(N)$ to $(\textbf{C},+)$.

I can't find any references for the following statement (I think that it must be well-known) :

Theorem :

The image of $C$ in $(\textbf{C},+)$ is a lattice unless $f$ is trivial (i.e. $f=0$).

I am looking for any references or ideas of a proof. Many thanks !

  • $\begingroup$ Genus of this curve? $\endgroup$ – Narasimham Mar 25 '15 at 13:59
  • $\begingroup$ I believe that in your result, you need to assume that $f$ has rational coefficients. $\endgroup$ – Bruno Joyal Mar 25 '15 at 21:48

I think this should follow from the fact that there exists a perfect pairing $$\langle\cdot ,\cdot\rangle \colon H_1(X_0(N),\mathbb R)\times H^0(X_0(N),\Omega^1_{\mathbb C})\to \mathbb C$$ $$\langle\{\alpha,\beta\},f\rangle=\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}f$$ Here $\{\alpha,\beta\}$ is the real homology class on $X_0(N)$ of any path from $\alpha$ to $\beta$ in $\mathcal H^*$ and $f$ is a cuspform of weight $2$ and level $\Gamma_0(N)$ (under the canonical identification of $H^0(X_0(N),\Omega^1_{\mathbb C})$ with $S_2(\Gamma_0(N))$).

Now there is a theorem which tells you that for any congruence subgroup $G\leq \text{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)$ and any fixed $\alpha\in \mathcal H^*$ the map $$G\to H_1(X_G,\mathbb Z)$$ $$g\mapsto \{\alpha,g\alpha\}$$ is a surjective group homomorphism which does not depend on $\alpha$. (For a proof of this, you can look at the paper "Parabolic points and zeta-functions of modular curves" by Y.Manin). This implies that the image of your homomorphism coincides with the image of the homomorphism $$\langle\cdot,f\rangle\colon H_1(X_0(N),\mathbb Z)\to \mathbb C$$ $$\gamma\mapsto \int_{\gamma}f$$ obtained by restricting the bilinear pairing I defined above to $H_1(X_0(N),\mathbb Z)$.

Edit: the conclusion was wrong, as Bruno noticed.

For more details about these topics, you can take a look at http://wstein.org/books/modform/modform/weight_two.html or at the nice book by W. Stein "Modular forms, a computational approach".

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Why global holomorphic forms on $X_0(N)$ corresponds to weight 2 cusp forms? I think all weight 2 modular forms induce a holomorphic form on the quotient. $\endgroup$ – Mostafa Mar 25 '15 at 19:21
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Ferra, there is a problem in the above proof in the sense that $\mathbb C$ contains free $\mathbb Z$-modules of arbitrary rank, thus there is no reason a priori why the rank should be $\leq 2$. In fact, the fact that $f$ is an eigenform, which you have not used, is crucial; for a generic $f$, I would even think that the period mapping is injective on $H_1(X, \mathbb Z)$. $\endgroup$ – Bruno Joyal Mar 25 '15 at 21:17
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Bruno, you're right, I was assuming in my mind that the image is discrete... $\endgroup$ – Ferra Mar 26 '15 at 7:11
  • $\begingroup$ Well, this is my fault, but I have very few notions on algebraic topology and geometry... I plan to work on it later. Tell me if this answer is correct so I can valid it ! But many thanks for your answer ! $\endgroup$ – Stabilo Mar 28 '15 at 18:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.