2
$\begingroup$

In the hypothesis of the martingale central limit theorem, my book says that given a sequence of random variables $X_n$ with the condition that $E(X_n \mid \mathcal F_{n-1}) = 0$, then $S_n = \sum_{i=0}^n X_i$ is a $\mathcal F_n$ martingale.

Now I suppose that the $\left(\mathcal F_n\right)_{n \ge 0}$ is a filtration (thought it's not specified) but apart from that are there any other condition to be assumed on $\mathcal F_n$? Because otherwise, I can't show that $S_n$ is a martingale.

If $S_m$ is measurable wrt to $\mathcal F_m$, then it's easy, since $$E(S_n \mid \mathcal F_m) = E(S_m \mid \mathcal F_m) + E(X_{m+1} + \dots + X_n \mid \mathcal F_m) = S_m + E(X_{m+1} + \dots + X_n \mid \mathcal F_m)$$

And one can use the power property of conditional expectation to show that $E(X_{m+1} + \dots + X_n \mid \mathcal F_m) = 0$

But how to show that $S_m$ is $\mathcal F_m$ measurable?

Should we require $\mathcal F_m = \sigma(\bigcup_{i=0}^m \sigma(X_i))$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

We have to require that $X_n$ is $\mathcal F_n$-measurable. Otherwise, take $\mathcal F_n=\mathcal F=$ a $\sigma$-algebra independent of the $X_n$'s and suppose that $X_n$ are centered and not degenerated. Then we have $\mathbb E[X_n\mid \mathcal F_{n-1}] =0$ for each $n$ but $X_n$ is not $\mathcal F_n$-measurable.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I see, thank you :) So I take it was a forgetfulness of the book? $\endgroup$
    – Ant
    Mar 18, 2015 at 13:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .