3
$\begingroup$

Define a function $\phi: \mathbb{R}[x] \to \mathbb{C}$ by $\phi(f(x)) = f(i), \forall f(x) \in \mathbb{R}[x]$.

  1. Is $\phi$ a ring homomorphism?

  2. Find a concrete $f(x) \in \mathbb{R}[x]$ such that $deg(f(x)) = 3$ and $deg(\phi(f(x))) = 0.$

  3. Find a concrete $g(x) \in \mathbb{R}[x]$ such that $(\phi(g(x))) = 13 -45i$.

My attempt: I know this is a very elementary level question, but I need to make sure I am doing it right. So, here it goes:

  1. I am slightly confused here. Can we just say that $\phi$ is a ring homomorphism because $\phi(f(x)+g(x))=\phi((f+g)(x)) = (f+g)(i) = f(i)+g(i) = \phi(f(x)) + \phi(g(x))$ and $\phi(f(x)g(x))=\phi((fg)(x)) = (fg)(i) = f(i)g(i) = \phi(f(x)\phi(g(x))?$

  2. Let, $f(x) = x^3 + x $. Then, $\phi(f(x)) = i^3 + i = -i + i = 0.$ Is this correct?

  3. Let, $g(x) = 13 - 45x$. Then, $\phi(g(x)) = 13 - 45i$

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ yes$~~~~~~~~~~~$ $\endgroup$ – user87543 Mar 13 '15 at 18:33
  • $\begingroup$ Seems correct, however for 1 check if your def of ring homomorphism requires $f(1)=1$. It's satisfied but you may need to say it for completeness. $\endgroup$ – Gregory Grant Mar 13 '15 at 18:34
  • $\begingroup$ I guess I could check, but the definition we've learned doesn't require us to check $f(1) = 1$ $\endgroup$ – Jellyfish Mar 13 '15 at 18:37
  • $\begingroup$ @GregoryGrant Since the codomain is a field (domain would suffice) and the map is not constantly $0$, the fact that $\phi(1)=1$ is automatic. $\endgroup$ – egreg Mar 13 '15 at 18:41
  • $\begingroup$ @egreg it may be automatic but that still needs to be noted in the solution if indeed it's required by the particular definition used. $\endgroup$ – Gregory Grant Mar 13 '15 at 19:56
2
$\begingroup$
  1. Yes. Alternatively, you can use the universal property of polynomial rings to note that "evaluating at a point" is always a ring homomorphism

  2. What is the degree of a complex number, anyway?

  3. Yes

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @OP beware that $(1)$ is true only for commutative rings (or $R$-algebras). Indeed evaluating $\,rx = xr\,$ at $\,s\in S\,$ yields $\,rs = sr\,$ so $\,r\,$ commutes with all elements of $\,S.\,$ This necessary condition turns out to be sufficient for evaluation maps to be ring homs. $\endgroup$ – Bill Dubuque Mar 13 '15 at 20:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.