0
$\begingroup$

In "Quantum Computing verstehen", the author uses both $|ab>$ and $|a,b>$ to describe the state of a 2-bit quantum register. Is there any important difference between those two notations or do they basically mean the same?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

It's the same in quantum information theory. They both mean $|a\rangle\otimes|b\rangle$. The second is just a little more explicit than the first since you're separating the two vectors by a comma. In quantum information this isn't so much a problem since $a$ and $b$ only take the values of $0$ or $1$, but in more general contexts (i.e. number states), the comma is imperative because it is difficult to discern the exact meaning of $|ab\rangle$. Take for instance $|231\rangle$ in the former notation in a composite number state system (like two harmonic oscillators combined). How would you interpret this? $|2\rangle\otimes|31\rangle$ or $|23\rangle\otimes|1\rangle$? With a comma in place it becomes clear what is meant and there is no ambiguity.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

According to this article Composite bras and kets there is no difference.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.