Let $$S= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n!}{n^n}$$

(Does anybody know of a closed form expression for $S$?)

It is easy to show that the series converges.

Prove that $S$ is irrational.

I tried the sort of technique that works to prove $e$ is irrational, but got bogged down.

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ As an aside, $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{n!}{n^n} \quad = \quad \int_0^\infty \frac{E(x)}{e^x} dx$$ where $\displaystyle\lim_{n \to 0} n^n = 1,$ and $$E(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^n}{n^n} \qquad \text{and} \qquad e^x = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^n}{n!}$$ $\endgroup$ – Lucian Mar 11 '15 at 20:49
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Also note that: $$\int_{0}^1 n(-x\log(x))^{n-1} dx=\frac{n!}{n^n}$$ $$\int_{0}^1\frac{1}{(x\ln(x)+1)^2}dx=\int_{0}^1 \sum_{n=1}^\infty n(-x\log(x))^{n-1} dx=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{n!}{n^n}$$ $\endgroup$ – Ethan Mar 11 '15 at 21:15
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Continued fraction: $\displaystyle\DeclareMathOperator*{\K}{K}S=b_0+\K_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{a_n}{b_n}$ where $b_0=1$, $b_1=2$, $a_1=2$, and for $n\geq 2$, $a_n=-n^{2n-1}$ and $b_n=n^n+(n+1)^n$. $\endgroup$ – GPhys Jun 16 '17 at 16:58
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Is there any context to this problem, i.e. is it well known that the series is an irrational number? $\endgroup$ – Ivan Jun 17 '17 at 17:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Computation seems to suggest a simple approach based on a Liouville approximation theorem is actually hopeless regardless of how clever your approximations are (at least when using the series as given): Table[N[Sum[n!/n^n,{n,m+1,Infinity}]-c/Denominator[Sum[n!/n^n,{n,1,m}]]],{m,1,20}] $\endgroup$ – GPhys Jun 18 '17 at 14:08

I couldn't mimic the proof of irrationality of $e$ but here goes my atempt ...

To prove the irrationality of $S=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{n!}{n^n}$ it would be enough to find an infinite continued fraction expansion. For convenience, I am redefining $S$ adding a 0th term equal to one $\frac{0!}{0^0}:=1$

We first write $S$ in the form $S=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_0 \cdot a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdots a_n $. If we calculate the ratio of two consecutive terms in the original definition of $S$ we find that, for $n\ge 2$ $$\frac{\frac{n!}{n^n}}{\frac{(n-1)!}{(n-1)^{n-1}}}=(1-\frac{1}{n})^{n-1}$$

So we can write $$\frac{n!}{n^n}=(1-\frac{1}{n})^{n-1} \cdot (1-\frac{1}{n-1})^{n-2} \cdots (1-\frac{1}{2})^1$$

Seting $a_0:=1, a_1:=1$ and $a_n=(1-\frac{1}{n})^{n-1}$ for $n\ge 2$ we find that $$ S=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_0 \cdot a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdots a_n $$ Now we make use of Euler's continued fraction formula: $$a_0 + a_0a_1 + a_0a_1a_2 + \cdots + a_0a_1a_2\cdots a_n = \cfrac{a_0}{1 - \cfrac{a_1}{1 + a_1 - \cfrac{a_2}{1 + a_2 - \cfrac{\ddots}{\ddots \cfrac{a_{n-1}}{1 + a_{n-1} - \cfrac{a_n}{1 + a_n}}}}}}\,$$

But this is not yet a proper continued fraction $b_0 + \cfrac{1}{b_1 + \cfrac{1}{b_2 + \cfrac{1}{ \ddots + \cfrac{1}{b_n} }}}$ and we can't make use of the result of irrationality stated above.

We can apply an equivalence transformation: $$\cfrac{x_1}{y_1 + \cfrac{x_2}{y_2 + \cfrac{x_3}{y_3 + \cfrac{x_4}{y_4 + \ddots\,}}}} = \cfrac{z_1x_1}{z_1y_1 + \cfrac{z_1z_2x_2}{z_2z_2 + \cfrac{z_2z_3x_3}{z_3z_3 + \cfrac{z_3z_4x_4}{z_4z_4 + \ddots\,}}}}$$ (which holds if all the x's, y's and z's are nonzero)

by setting $x_1:=a_0,y_1=1$ and, for $n \ge 1$ $x_n:= -a_{n-1}, y_n:=1+a_{n-1}$ and choosing the sequence of z's satisfy the relation $z_{n+1}=\frac{1}{x_{n+1} z_n}$.

So, at the end we get an infinite proper continued fraction expansion.

Hope this helps.

  • $\begingroup$ This looks promising but I'm trying to see if there are flaws. The first thing that comes to mind is: If $r\in \Bbb R$ can be expressed as an infinite continued fraction, why does that imply that $r$ is irrational? Perhaps it is possible for $r$ to be expressed as a finite continued fraction, or in some other rational form, as well as the infinite continued fraction. Of course, if $r$ can be expressed as a finite continued fraction then $r$ is rational but that is not the same as the statement you have used. $\endgroup$ – Mark Fischler Sep 9 '17 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ True. The assertion that a number is irrational if a contitued fraction expansion is infinite is not completely true. It only holds if the expansion is obtained by a certain method that involves finding the integer part of the reciprocal of the residue of the last aproximation. Thats why I tried to give it the standard form [b0;,b1,b2,...] with the b's being positive integers. $\endgroup$ – Arundo Donax Sep 10 '17 at 17:13
  • $\begingroup$ To be more precise, if $x$ is a positive real number and we define $x_1=x, b_1=[x_1]$ and, for $n \ge 1$, $b_{n+1}=[x_n], x_{n+1}=\frac{1}{x_n-b_n}$ then the sequence of b's becomes eventually equal to one if and only if $x$ is rational; and these b's are the terms of the contiuned fraction expansion of $x$. $\endgroup$ – Arundo Donax Sep 10 '17 at 17:24
  • $\begingroup$ If the $b_n$ are eventually equal to $1$ doesn't that give an infinite CF expansion (related to $\sqrt{2}$)? At any rate, I'd be interested to see how this statement was proven, although perhaps it requires advanced methods. $\endgroup$ – Mark Fischler Sep 11 '17 at 16:59

This doesn't answer the question.


Wolfy calculates it as


and the inverse symbolic calculator doesn't know, so I would be surprised if there is a reasonable formula.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.