1
$\begingroup$

Let $\{f_n\}$ be a equicontinuous sequence and converge pointwise in a compact set $K$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$. Prove that the sequence converge uniformly in $K$.

My attempt: Since $\{f_n\}$ is equicontinuous, given $\epsilon > 0$, there exist a $\delta >0$ such that $$|f_{i}(x)-f_{i}(y)|<\epsilon$$ if $1\leq i \leq n $ and $|x-y|<\delta.$ In fact, we know that, given $\epsilon>0$ there exist $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that, as $n \geq N$ then $|f_n - f|<\epsilon$. I must prove that the convergence is uniform.

Since continuous functions are uniformly continuous on compact set, then, given $\epsilon>0$ there exist $\delta (\epsilon)>0$ such that, as $|x-y|<\delta$ we have $|f_{i}(x)-f_{i}(y)|<\epsilon$. So, taking $n \geq N, m\geq N$ there exist a $\delta>0$ such that, as $|x-y|<\delta$ then $$|f_{n}(x) - f_{m}(x)|<|f_{n}(x)-f_{n}(y)| + |f_{n}(y)-f_{m}(y)| + |f_{m}(y)-f_{m}(x)|<3\epsilon,$$

where $|f_{n}(y)-f_{m}(y)|<\epsilon$ by pointwise convergence.

Thus, $\{f_n\}$ is Cauchy, and then $\{f_n\} \rightarrow f$ uniformly.

Is this correct?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

No. Observe that you have not used the equicontinuity of the sequence. If your proof were correct, then any sequence of continuous functions that converges pointwise on a compact set would converge uniformly. The error is in the phrase "$|f_n(y)-f_m(y)|<\epsilon$ by pointwise convergence".

Let $f$ be the pointwise limit of $(f_n)$. The way to prove the result is to show, using the Ascoli-Arzèla theorem, that every subsequence of $(f_n)$ has a subsequence that converges uniformly, necessarily to $f$.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

No it's not, you're not giving the right justifications. Fix $x$ and $\varepsilon > 0$. $y$ will be as close to $x$ as it has to be.

To bounds $|f_n(x)-f_n(y)|$ independantly of $x$ and $n$ you need uniform equicontinuity, which is a consequence of equicontinuity on a compact set. same thing for $|f_m(y)-f_m(x)|$.

to bounds $|f_n(y)-f_m(y)|$ independantly of y (and thus independantly of x) you'll need uniform convergence of the sequence $(f_n)$, this is not good. An other idea is to chose wisely $y$ : remark that this bound doesn't have to work for every $y$ close to $x$. from first part there exists $\delta > 0$ which doesn't depend on x such that $|x-y|<\delta \Rightarrow |f_n(x)-f_n(y)|<\varepsilon$ and $|f_m(y)-f_m(x)|<\varepsilon$. You juste have to take a finite number of $y_i$ such that $K \subset \bigcup_i B(y_i,\delta)$, this is possible by compacity of $K$. Because the $y_i$ are in finite number and by ponctual convergence, for $n,m$ large enough you'll have $|f_n(y_i)-f_m(y_i)|<\varepsilon$ for all $i$. Note that in this way the $y_i$ will depends on $\varepsilon$. So for $n,m$ large enough and taking $|y_i-x|<\delta$ you get that $|f_n(x)-f_n(x)|<|f_n(x)-f_n(y_i)|+|f_n(y_i)-f_m(y_i)|+|f_m(y_i)-f_m(x)|<3\varepsilon$ uniformly over $K$, so $(f_n)$ is Cauchy.

This is not the nicest way to prove it IMO. Two other ways are the following :

1) use relative compacity of $\{f_n\}$ and a lemma of Cantor : a sequence has a limite $l$ iff from every subsequence you can extract an other subsequence converging to $l$

2) show first that the limit of $\{f_n\}$ must be continous and then that the convergence is uniform.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.