2
$\begingroup$

In reading through the proof of Lovász Local Lemma in a probability book, I came across some questions that I hope someone could clarify.

  1. In the proof, a lower bound is found for the probability of $\bigwedge_{i=1}^n\bar{A_i},$ where $A_1,...,A_n$ are events in an arbitrary probability space. I am not sure what we are actually finding the probability of; I am not sure what the wedge notation means in this context and it does not seem to be defined in the book. Does it mean the intersection of all of the complements of $A_i, i=1,...,n$?

  2. In the proof, they let $S_1=\{j\in S: (i,j)\in E\}$ and $S_2=S-S_1$. Then they state that $$\mathbb{P}(A_i \vert \bigwedge_{j\in S}\bar{A_j})=\frac{\mathbb{P}(A_i \wedge (\bigwedge_{j\in S_1}\bar{A_j} )\vert \bigwedge_{l\in S_2}\bar{A_l})}{\mathbb{P}(\bigwedge_{j\in S_1}\bar{A_j} \vert \bigwedge_{l\in S_2}\bar{A_l})}.$$ I am not sure why this equality holds either. I know that for conditional probability in general, we have that $\mathbb{P}(E |F)=\mathbb{P}(EF)/\mathbb{P}(F)$, but I don't quite see how we have that above. Any explanation would be greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This notation is maybe a bit old-fashioned. If $A,B$ are events, then $$A\text{ and }B = A \wedge B$$ is the event that happens iff both $A$ and $B$ happen. In Kolmogorov's model for probability, this is the intersection. $\endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 17:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's not at all old-fashioned. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 17:38

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

It's simply a case of treating events as logical propositions rather sets of outcomes.

$A\wedge B$ means "event $A$ happens and event $B$ happens". It's the conjunction or intersection of events.

$A\vee B$ means "either event $A$ happens or event $B$ happens". It's the disjunction or union of events.

The big wedge notation is the series conjunction operator. $$\bigwedge_{i=1}^n A_i = A_1\wedge A_2\wedge \cdots \wedge A_n$$

I know that for conditional probability in general, we have that $\Bbb P(E|F)=\Bbb P(EF)/\Bbb P(F)$, but I don't quite see how we have that above.

That would be written as $\Bbb P(E\mid F) = \Bbb P(E\wedge F)/\Bbb P(F)$

And we have $\Bbb P(E\mid F\wedge G) = \frac{\Bbb P(E\wedge F\wedge G)}{\Bbb P(F\wedge G)}=\frac{\Bbb P(E\wedge F\mid G)\;\Bbb P(G)}{\Bbb P(F\mid G)\;\Bbb P(G)}=\frac{\Bbb P(E\wedge F\mid G)}{\Bbb P(F\mid G)}$ , so:

$$\begin{align}\mathbb{P}(A_i \vert \bigwedge_{j\in S}\bar{A_j}) & = \Bbb P(A_i\mid \bigwedge_{j\in S_1} A_j \wedge \bigwedge_{l\in S_2} A_l) \\ & =\frac{\mathbb{P}(A_i \wedge (\bigwedge_{j\in S_1}\bar{A_j} )\vert \bigwedge_{l\in S_2}\bar{A_l})}{\mathbb{P}(\bigwedge_{j\in S_1}\bar{A_j} \vert \bigwedge_{l\in S_2}\bar{A_l})} \end{align}$$

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .