6
$\begingroup$

I am working on exercise 1.9 b) in the book "Probability and Stochastics" by Erhan Çınlar to practice my understanding of $\sigma$-algebras (although this might possibly be future homework in my classes).

Anyway, here's the exercise:

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a (countable) partition of E. Show that every element of $\sigma \mathcal{C}$ is a countable union of elements taken from $\mathcal{C}$.

So, $\mathcal{C} = \{ C_n: n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ is a partition of $E$. To prove the exercise, I have introduced $\mathcal{E} = \{\cup_{i \in I} C_i: I \subseteq \mathbb{N}\}$ and am trying to show that $\mathcal{E}$ is a $\sigma$-algebra.

For this, I have to show the following three parts/properties (correct me if I'm wrong):

  1. E $\in \mathcal{C}$: $\mathcal{C}$ is a partition of E, so $\cup \mathcal{C}=E.$ Since $\mathcal{C}$ is countable, $\cup \mathcal{C}$ is the union of countably many members of $\mathcal{C}$.

  2. Show that $\mathcal{E}$ is closed under countable unions: Since $\mathcal{E}$ consists only of sets which are countable unions of elements of $\mathcal{C}$, $\mathcal{E}$ is closed under countable unions.

  3. Show that $\mathcal{E}$ is closed under complement: Let $A \in \mathcal{C}$, so there exists a countable $\mathcal{C}_A \subseteq \mathcal{C}$ such that $A = \cup \mathcal{C}_A.$ Let $\mathcal{D} = \mathcal{C} \setminus \mathcal{C}_A$; then $\mathcal{D}$ is a countable subset of $\mathcal{C}$, and if $D =\cup \mathcal{D},$ then $D \in \mathcal{C}.$ Since $\mathcal{C}$ is a partition on E, $D = E \setminus A = A^c$, and so $A^c\in \mathcal{C}$.

Now, in the last part I want to show that $\mathcal{E} = \sigma\mathcal{C}$, but I'm not sure how exactly this is done.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ what does $I \leq \mathbb{N}$ mean ? Just precise it (ok thanks). Otherwise, you seem to have it all. You showed that $\mathcal{E}$ is a sigma-algebra, obviously contained in $\sigma \mathcal{C}$. What could you do to show this is an equality ? $\endgroup$ Mar 3 '15 at 7:44
  • $\begingroup$ Ah that is a typo, it is supposed to be $I \subseteq \mathbb{N}$, I've changed it in the post just now. $\endgroup$
    – Olorun
    Mar 3 '15 at 7:50
  • $\begingroup$ Well I guess then next I would show that $\sigma \mathcal{C}$ is contained in $\mathcal{E}$? I'm also not completely sure if my proof for the "countable under countable union" property is 100% correct. $\endgroup$
    – Olorun
    Mar 3 '15 at 7:53
  • $\begingroup$ Your proof for pt 2 is right. If you want it more rigorous, just write it with the index : let $(A_i)$ be a countable family of sets in $\mathcal{E}$. Then, for every $i$, there is a countable set $J_i$ such that $A_i = \cup_{j \in I_i} C_j$. Therefore, $\cup_{i \in I} A_i = \cup_{j \in K} C_i$, where $K$ is the union of all the $J_i$ over $i \in I$. As a countable union of countable sets is clearly countable, $K$ is countable and $\cup_{i \in I} A_i $ is in $\mathcal{E}$. $\endgroup$ Mar 3 '15 at 7:56
  • $\begingroup$ To prove that $\mathcal{E} = \sigma (\mathcal{C})$, you could maybe use a property of $\sigma(\mathcal{C})$... $\endgroup$ Mar 3 '15 at 7:58
5
$\begingroup$

Here's a proof using only the material covered in Çınlar before your exercise. As you showed, $\mathcal{E}$ is a $\sigma$-algebra containing $\mathcal{C}$. It is obviously contained in $\sigma(\mathcal{C})$ : to see that, all we have to say is that $\sigma(\mathcal{C}$ must contain all the countable unions of elements in $\mathcal{C}$, so it contains all the elements of $\mathcal{E}$. Therefore, $\mathcal{E} \subset \sigma (\mathcal{C})$.

But, $\sigma(\mathcal{C})$ is defined as the intersection of all the $\sigma$-algebras containing $\mathcal{C}$. Therefore, as $\mathcal{E}$ is a $\sigma$-algebra containing $\mathcal{C}$, it is clear that $\sigma(\mathcal{C})$ is contained in $\mathcal{E}$.

So, $\mathcal{E} = \sigma (\mathcal{C})$.

This kind of reasonning is very very common in measure theory, analysis, probability. Make sure you understand all the things here. It works like this : to prove that two $\sigma$-algebras are equal, you write one as the $\sigma$-algebra generated by a collection, and you show that the other is a $\sigma$-algebra containing this collection and contained in the first one.

Have a nice time with Çınlar's excellent textbook :)

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the very intuitive summary! $\endgroup$
    – Olorun
    Mar 3 '15 at 8:20
  • $\begingroup$ (btw, you made a small typo: "reasonning" is written with only one n: reasoning) $\endgroup$
    – Olorun
    Mar 3 '15 at 8:29
  • $\begingroup$ You mean, "reasoning" is written with two $n$, not three. Damn, my English is not perfect ^^ $\endgroup$ Mar 3 '15 at 8:30
  • $\begingroup$ @TlönUqbarOrbisTertius Kind of late to the game here, but thank you for this answer and explanation! I really appreciate it. $\endgroup$ Apr 10 at 16:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.