I have a couple of questions on how cellular homology is used in computing singular homology. Here is what should be a simple example given as an exercise in my class, the questions will follow:

Let $X$ be the 2-dimensional CW-complex obtained from $S^1$ by attaching two 2-cells by maps of degree $a$ and $b$, respectively, where $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime integers. Compute the integral homology of $X$.

Now, I understand that generators of $H_n(X^n,X^{n-1})$ can be identified with the $n$-cells of X, so we have the following chain: $0 \rightarrow H_2(X^2,X^1) \rightarrow H_1(X^1,X^0) \rightarrow H_0(H^0) \rightarrow 0$, with the first group $H_2(X^2,X^1)$ generated by $e^2_1$ and $e^2_2$.

What I don't understand is how the Cellular Boundary Formula: $d_n(e^n_\alpha)=\Sigma_\beta{d_{\alpha\beta}e^{n-1}_\beta}$ is used. Hatcher's book says that $d_{\alpha\beta}$ is the degree of "the composition of the attaching map of the $n$-cell $e^n_\alpha$ with the quotient map collapsing $X^{n-1}-e^{n-1}_\beta$ to a point". In our example above we have the degree of the map from each 2-cell to $S^1$, but we don't know the CW-structure of that $S^1$ (it could be one 1-cell and one 0-cell, or two 1-cells and two 0-cells etc.), so how am I supposed to figure out what to sum over in the formula above to calculate the $d_2$ map? The homology groups must be the same whatever structure of $S^1$ we use, so could I just use any structure? The degree of a composition is the product of the degrees of the components, and we know the degree of one component (those are $a$ and $b$ in the example, right?) but what is the degree of the collapsing map? As you can see I am quite a bit confused about this, no intuition whatsoever, so any help would be greatly appreciated. If I am looking at this completely wrong do correct me, please.


You can indeed use any structure. The simplest is of course one 0-cell one 1-cell, then the collapsing map becomes trivial. The gluing map for each 2-cell maps onto the single one cell. The complement of this 1-cell is the empty set, so the quotient or collapsing map is just the identity and you're left with the degree being the degree of the gluing map. That is a or b.

  • $\begingroup$ So just to confirm I understood this: since we have $d_2(e^2_1)=ae^1_2$ and $d_2(e^2_2)=be^1_2$ and $(a,b)=1$ it follows that $Ker(d_2)\cong\mathbb{Z}$, so $H_2(X)\cong\mathbb{Z}$. Also, since we put the one 1-cell one 0-cell structure on $S^1$ we have that $d_1$ is a zero map, $ker(d_1)\cong\mathbb{Z}$ and $H_0(X)\cong\mathbb{Z}$. Finaly, since $H_2(X^2,X^1)\cong\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}$ and $Ker(d_2)\cong\mathbb{Z}$ then $H_1(X)=0$. Is this right? $\endgroup$ – baltazar Feb 28 '15 at 18:59
  • $\begingroup$ That all looks correct up to the last sentence. The result is correct, but your reasoning isn't clear. Unless I'm horrifically mistaken $H_1(X)\equiv\frac{ker(d_1)}{im(d_2)}$ since $(a,b)=1$, $d_2$ is surjective and therefore $H_1(X)\equiv 0$ $\endgroup$ – Robert Chamberlain Feb 28 '15 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you say that $H_1(X)\cong\frac{ker(d_1)}{im(d_2)}$ since $(a,b)=1$? Isn't it always equal to that quotient? Or is that comma in the wrong place? :) $\endgroup$ – baltazar Feb 28 '15 at 19:38
  • $\begingroup$ The comma is in the wrong place, I'm afraid my grammar is far worse than my maths! $\endgroup$ – Robert Chamberlain Feb 28 '15 at 19:39
  • $\begingroup$ Great. Thanks for the help. $\endgroup$ – baltazar Feb 28 '15 at 19:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.